I’ve recently played Resident Evil 6 for the 1st time after playing Resident Evil 4 (an absolute masterpiece) & Resident 5 (a pretty good game). I was already aware of the hate this game got over the years. But after experiencing it, it’s only bad in an artificial way. Like yeah, it’s nothing like the classic games and it’s too much in the action category.

Otherwise, as someone who loves action games, it’s a pretty fun game. Especially in Mercenaries Mode, where it’s fun to mow down body-horror themed enemies. As a Resident Evil game, it’s pretty bad. But…as an action third person shooter with splatter punks, it’s quite well executed

    • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Iirc most of the press was just “this cost waaaaay too much to make” rather than “its a bad movie”

      Thanks for reminding me I still need to actually watch it, though. And ive got a few hours to kill.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’ve always liked the Postman. With the exception of

        spoiler

        The scene at the end where society is totally back to normal in a totally unrealistic amount of time and they’re unveiling a statue of him. They should have just skipped that and had it end with him riding by the kid and grabbing the envelope.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        The idea of The Postman was really neat. I remember it was a very slow paced epic though. A lot of Costner movies are kinda…contemplative that way. Kinda chill I guess? Haha his Robin Hood was like that too.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      Waterworld, Sahara, and John Carter are all amazing movies that BOMBED… but by what metric? Tons of money in production and/or inept expensive marketing and it didn’t make it back.

      That’s all. It wasn’t a “market success.” But I’m glad they’re a part of culture.

      Sahara is the Uncharted movie we deserved. I wish we got more Clive Cussler movies. One of my favorite films.

      John Carter is the reason I will never properly pronounce “Virginia” again.

      Waterworld’s stunt show is incredible and the world building was awesome.

    • cheeseburger@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Yes, which reminds me of another hated movie I love: The Cable Guy aka Cabo Goobla:

      “Dry land is not a myth. I’ve seen it.” Kevin Costner. Waterworld. I don’t know what the big fuss is about. I saw that movie nine times. It rules!

      - Chip Douglas

      So much so that I’m always surprised when they get the quote wrong in Waterworld itself! 😅

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Especially back in the day. It was a major action movie event.

      I kind of feel the same way about Cutthroat Island. It was a massive failure, but the production value was great and I thought it was a fun action flick.

      Side Note: Waterworld is one of the few movies I recommend NOT watching the extended cut. The scenes are very low quality and feel like a TV production compared to the rest of the theatrical cut scenes.

    • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      I watched that movie when I was a kid and genuinely liked it. (I do still have really broad taste, the question can be answered for me with “most media, apparently”)

      It has a special place in my heart as one of a few dozen vhs we had that I could watch with no restrictions. (One of the banned movies was A clear and Present Danger, and I still don’t know why because I can’t stay awake through it because its boring. Another was Pulp Fiction. Maybe the first was a ruse!)

      Is it a good movie? Idk. But smeat is still funny to me in ways that probably would have hit the same if I’d watched it today for the first time, so…

  • StabbingSky@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    9 days ago

    Different entertainment genre, but Nickelback.

    Although I’m reasonably certain that 99% of people who hate on NB would sing along if it came on the radio.

    • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 days ago

      I have a friend, whom I typically respect, who surprised me with that hot take one day. He had similar things to say about Creed and Taylor Swift.

      Hes also been known to cheat at DnD, though. I love the guy but…

    • toddestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      The big problem, at least to me, is that they were massively overplayed on the radio and I grew tired of hearing the same song over and over again.

      Now hearing them again after a long break, I can recognize that they made some decent - not great, but still decent songs.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        That’s how I feel about Adele. Rolling in the Deep might even be objectively good but it GRATES on me because you’d hear it EVERYWHERE. ALL THE TIME.

        I think a lot of decent artists are foisted upon the public so forcefully they become loathed.

        • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          For me it’s sweet child o mine. It’s a classic song, but I’ve heard and played it myself so many times that I can’t stand it anymore. I always skip it when I can

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      I don’t mind their one song. But that’s the thing, they only have one song. (They all sound the same.)

      • rowansprig@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Well, not really. For example, my favourite Nickelback song, Sister Sin, is rather different from This Afternoon, or For the River, or Just to Get High, or many others. But they definitely do have a number which are rather similar to others of theirs - but then, I honestly have never listened to a band which didn’t have some that sounded a bit similar to others? Like, most Ed Sheeran songs are Ed Sheeran songs, most Sleep Token songs are Sleep Token songs…

        That said, Chad Kroegar’s voice is so distinctive that it makes everything they do sound instantly Nickelback.

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        But that’s the thing, they only have one song. (They all sound the same.)

        Mumford & Sons, Hootie & the Blowfish, and Live all say “Hi!” and want to know if they can join the party.

    • Malica@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      We sing along because it was forced on us 😭 a few songs are ok I guess, they’re like the junk food of music, small doses.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I can’t bring myself to hate Nickelback because they gave us one of the greatest meme templates in meme history.

    • tacosanonymous@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s the ultimate “pop” rock. It really works for a lot of people but anyone who doesn’t like formulaic music designed with the broadest appeal will absolutely dislike it.

    • neidu4@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I am not ashamed to admit that I have their first album, and it’s a solid one with quite a few solid tracks on it. However, I always hated that song, which by far became the most popular one.

      I don’t know much about their later stuff, though.

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    9 days ago

    How I Met Your Mother. There’s a ton of hate, and it’s well deserved. Ted is annoying, Lily’s selfish, and Barney could never be a character on national TV now. It tapers off around season 5-6 and then fails in season 9.

    However, it had a profound effect on me. I grew up in rural nowhere, Midwest USA, in a town with 2 bars and a gas station. Watching the group go out in the city going to bars and growing up there made me really connect, and made me feel a bit less isolated. I finally did move out and to a different city, and HIMYM did give me the hope to someday be like that, and now I am. I still re-watch every few years. It definitely hasn’t aged well, but it’s nostalgic for me.

    • otacon239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’ve always interpreted that show with Marshall as the main character. He goes through the most growth and also has the most altruistic intentions throughout. I see it as a demonstration that your friends and loved ones can be holding you back. Marshall deserved better than that friend group and he rarely if ever sacrifices his morals for the others.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        Lily especially in this watchthrough I’m noticing how much she does manipulate him. Season 2 leaving of course just destroys him, and then she comes back and just expects to be taken back like it’s nothing. Then expects the wedding and everything right after, wanting everything to move on like she didn’t just destroy all trust with him. The really sad thing is she left to see if she could be a painter while he never prevented her from doing that while being together, as Ted said there are so many ones in NYC why SF? She wanted to go off and be single, and he took her back way too easily.

        Then getting mad that he talks to his parents, or that he dreamed of maybe living somewhere else, or the credit card debt, or then being mad that he became a corporate lawyer to pay off her credit card debt. I feel bad for the guy

        • otacon239@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          Thank you! I genuinely believe that Lily is the least agreeable character in the show. Everyone else’s vices are brazen and loud, but she manages to sneak around and not get noticed because of how cute her demeanor is.

          • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yeah I just watched the episodes today where Marshall is having a crisis of character working for GNB and she gives him the go-ahead (or even the push) to quit his job to pursue his dream, and literally the next episode she is mad at him for doing exactly what she told him to do, and puts Ted on the spot again as she plans to just up and leave for a trip without talking to her husband. Her character wants to be supportive, but wants more to live her lifestyle

          • Malica@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            I like her character for this, gives her more dimension and imperfect characters are more interesting to me.

    • MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 days ago

      I loved watching that show, but the premise is a bit off. “Hey kids, let me tell you about all the chicks I banged before your mom.”

    • dkppunk@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      This is kind of how I feel about Friends too. It gets hated on for very valid reasons. But I will always remember being a teen watching the episode where Rachel and Monica have 1 condom left in the apartment and compete over who gets it. Then Monica goes to tell Chandler (I think?) that they can’t have sex because Rachel won the condom. He whines a bit, but she holds her ground. It’s one of the earliest pieces of media I remember watching that emphasized the importance of safe sex.

      • MarieMarion@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Sex and the city for me. They’re rich assholes. They’re also outspoken, assertive, strong. They taught a lot to teen me, a nerdy people-pleaser. They were the ones who made me realize I could just say no to men, and that having standards was a good thing.

    • Malica@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m with you, I love that show. I liked friends too. I love trashy TV, it’s like frozen pizza, hits the spot.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        I think sitcoms are an art form, people compare them to high price dramas and they aren’t. Sitcoms are your “friends” after a long day if work that you can count on to be reliable and low pressure. You watch them not for a good story necessarily, but to unwind after a day. Sadly I think that’s been lost over the last few years.

        • LemmyThinkAboutIt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Exactly, you watch them to just watch a bunch of characters get into crazy hijinks that aren’t real. Sometimes the writers throw in a serious storyline or some lessons, but for the most part they’re not meant to be taken seriously.

    • yyprum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      I love HIMYM, but it does indeed have a lot of issues. I did a rewatch and some things were painful to watch I have to admit. It will nonetheless have a special place always in my heart.

      The best it has are probably the songs. Neil Patrick Harris is so talented.

  • Soggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    9 days ago

    I like the Super Mario Bros movie, I don’t care how loosely connected it is to the games.

    • dkppunk@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      The old Super Mario Bros movie is a fantastic B scifi movie, it’s just a terrible Mario Bros movie. I still love it!

      • TheBlindPew@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 days ago

        There was actually a deleted scene originally in the movie where an executive from Nintendo met with Mario and Luigi to buy the rights to their story and that the movie was actually what happened and the games are the ones that changed things, which I’ve always thought was a fun tongue in cheek nod at the source material (or lack thereof).

      • MimicJar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 days ago

        I know a lot of films and TV pilots start as a writers original idea, sometimes even a great idea, but for one reason or another never get picked up. Or even worse it does get picked up. But in both cases someone says, “This won’t sell, can you make it Super Mario themed?”

        The writer, creative as they are and just happy to get work, then mashes the two together.

        I think a film featuring a parallel New York ruled by evolved dinosaurs and deevolution guns is a wild but potentially interesting film. What it has to do with Mario… I have no idea.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 days ago

          There’s so many movies / shows that feel like “They just pulled a generic plot off the shelf and branded it with this popular franchise.”

          I think that’s why Paramount Halo was painful. :(

  • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    9 days ago

    I really enjoy the original live action Super Mario Bros movie from the early 90s. The production was an absolute mess from beginning to end, but somehow, an actually watchable movie came out of it, and the story is actually somewhat entertaining, even if it has nothing to do with the actual games.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 days ago

      Lol the “deevolution” ray that turns a dude into a monke. 😂

      That movie was bizarre and wild. I like it too. I firmly file it under “Task failed successfully.” Lol

    • toddestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      I have to say I enjoy that movie a lot too. I’m not denying that it’s a terrible movie, but it’s terrible in a very watchable and enjoyable way.

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 days ago

    The Last Jedi. It took me a while to even process the hate, and I still don’t really respect it, but I think I understand it. TLJ is flawed but by far the best sequel, and an Ep9 where Kylo is beyond redemption and rebels and force users are bubbling up from everywhere could have been really interesting.

    Even if they’d backtracked thematically, The Rise of Skywalker made a huge mistake in overtly shitting on it, literally fucking over its own story (such as it was) and pacing to do so, and thereby pleasing no one. Even if you don’t like what your partner did, you have to “Yes, and…,” not go full “Michael Scott in improv class.”

    • madmantis24@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s always going to be one of my favorite Star Wars sequels because I got into it around the tail end of a deep depression and watched it early enough not to fall for the bad press

      Luke’s story hit home in a weird way and I liked that Johnson at least tried to make Rey’s parents irrelevant as a much-needed dismissal of the whole idea that the fate of the galaxy far far away hinges on at least one magical bloodline

      On top of that it’s given me a good litmus test for what differences in opinion should actually be respected. Don’t like the movie? Fine, but it is rather telling to me in all the ways people get downright aggressive over hating on it

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Luke’s story hit home in a weird way

        IMHO it it home because that is almost the only way it could have been done, especially after what JJ set up in The Force Awakens. We know that Luke blamed himself. We know he ran away. We know not even Leia can locate him via the Force. At least being a grumpy hermit was a way to take back a little bit of agency. When you have a hero’s journey, and the hero’s journey ends, you’re not really supposed to revisit them thirty years later with a massive new threat, because now they have to face it, but not as the hero. Once you decide you have to have Luke in the damn story, there is nothing you can do except make him a mentor or a villain. Villain was right out, but having him fall back into old habits (doomerism, jumping to conclusions, whining) and having all that make him start as an ineffective mentor was actually really clever.

        It also maybe hit a little close to home for the generation that grew up idolizing Luke, re-evaluating what he was after reaching his heights in his mid-20s. That said, it also tells that same group, “Yes, you are fatter and angrier and grabbing breakfast and a latte is the most interesting thing you’ll do most days, but you have wisdom to pass down, and you have the power to beat back the darkness and learn from your own mistakes, and there is so much more to you than you’ve come to believe about yourself.” I actually walked out of the movie thinking that once you have a Luke that let the First Order arise at all, then this Luke was a god-damn hero and saved the galaxy one last time.

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 days ago

          Not that I’m on top of such things but I heard episode 7, 8 and 9 were conceptually laid out together. But the new director for 8 found it limiting or something so threw it in the trash to create something else.

    • Tujio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 days ago

      I thought that most of the movie was somewhere between fine and fun, but that casino planet sequence was so unbearably bad that it soured the entire movie for me. I thought it was poorly-done, ham-handed social commentary awkwardly shoehorned into a strangely long sequence. And then at the end of it, they were in the exact same position they were at the beginning. It took a huge chunk of the second act, and it basically amounted to nothing.

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 days ago

        It took a huge chunk of the second act, and it basically amounted to nothing.

        Love it or hate it, and the fact that some people will decide they hate it is what I had to come to terms with, this was very intentional and played into the theme of Poe’s arc while letting Finn get the small amount of character growth they layered on in TLJ. It also made it clear that Rose is not so much a fully fleshed-out character as she is a stand-in for the entire Resistance, so she gets a chance to make its case and show its impact. Fighting the good fight is worth it even if, in the short term, it seems doomed. Narratively, I thought Canto Bight did a lot.

      • madmantis24@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Canto Bight hits different after you burned out doing odd jobs at the sleazy casino on the edge of town

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      The biggest issue with TLJ that I don’t see brought up a lot is that it left no where for the story to go.

      We enter the movie with the First Order the only force in the galaxy after only destroying a few planets in the last movie, and somehow the resistance is even smaller than it was before.

      We end the movie without really anything changing (except the resistance is even smaller - like 20 people).

      Unless it was going to be four movies, TLJ doesn’t leave a lot of directions for the story. It basically has to be Rey trying to decapitate the head of the First Order by killing Ben. Rise of Skywalker fails because TLJ didn’t do anything to move the plot, forcing two movies worth of plot into one.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Yeah, that’s the part that bugged me too. There was so much “subverting expectations” to be clever and huff ones’ own farts…But no satisfying storytelling in place.

        It was written like an on-the-fly television show like “Ah HAH this will be unexpected and get eyeballs and maybe we’ll explain it in season 6!” . . .but it was a movie, and it was just over…and a bunch of empty threads kinda went nowhere for ~2 hours straight.

        It was entertaining! I watched it and first said “WOW. That was like the BEST Star Wars in a WHILE.” Then we thought about it…and realized nothing actually made any sense. Kinda like when you look at Ai stuff, weirdly enough. Lots of flash but it’s clear there was no actual intent behind it.

        Also Finn was supposed to be a force-sensitive Stormtrooper who grows a conscience and turns Jedi. Finn was robbed. That bothers me so much that he just got relegated to backseat supporting sidekick to a cardboard cutout who should’ve had some depth.

    • TipRing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      My take away was that the protagonists were too caught up in being the protagonists and the outcome would have been better if they had just done nothing.

      Which just isn’t a very good adventure story.

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      TLJ is just about the best movie in the whole series. The hatred is 85% pissed-off fans who thought the franchise belonged to them. And the rest is just anti-woke hysterics.

      In time, TLJ will get the respect it deserves.

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        I do think the movie was weak on the handwavium when a few lines could have turned the siege/chase into something a little more compelling. Some of the dialogue skewed a bit Marvel-y, and Finn’s TLJ arc was way too similar to his TFA arc, only nudging forward his circle of empathy a bit. I also wish wish wish somebody had simply said the Holdo maneuver worked because she locked onto the hyperspace tracker: BOOM, two birds with one battlecruiser. Casino planet dragged a bit, but I didn’t mind it nearly as much as others. Maz was wasted, and in some ways, the whole movie actually mapped too closely to ESB (subversion indeed).

        However, Luke’s arc hit me exactly right given that they were forced to revisit a Hero’s-Journey hero whose journey was done, because JJ Abrams set up the galaxy in possibly the least compelling way possible. Luke’s return from backsliding into his own old habits, accepting his failure, and using the energy he had left to secure a future for the next generation… that’s good stuff, and a lot of the boomers and older X’s who idolized him would do well to heed the lesson.

        The initial tone poem with Rose’s sister was beautiful. DJ absolutely fit as a tweak on Lando and commentary on what all this is supposed to mean. The Poe arc that he can’t simply Maverick his way into leadership, the idea that Rey was no one and yet everything, that Force users and resistance could come from anywhere, and that Ren was on a path apart from Snoke’s but equally irredeemable, all these things were HUGE improvements from TFA and were setting things up for a very compelling finale.

        Instead, JJ crammed in his own Episode 8 into the first 45 minutes, left no time to have his own movie make any sense, just channelled Harry Potter and the Avengers for its conclusion, and repeatedly reminded people that TLJ was being undone (“come with us, Rose!” “Can’t! Leia gave me homework!”… We picked “Yer a Palpatine, Rey!” from the hat full of fan theories!), thereby reminding TLJ’s fans that it was being undone, and its haters that it existed. Just a piece of shit movie all around, and to top it off, with my “ACKSHULLY” cap on, it still didn’t connect the tracker with the Holdo maneuver!!!

        Finally, for what it’s worth, TLJ is the only ST movie to engage in good faith with the PT, which is something you need to do, even if (like me) they’re far from your favorites.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah it’s the best of the 3, but it’s also just about the worst middle part of a trilogy they could do. It rejects the setup and doesn’t really set up well for the finale, while going off and doing its own thing. The trilogy was pretty doomed before it, but it was the killing blow

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        You see, i don’t think so. I think it is definitely redirecting the setup, but apart from sheer number of remaining rebels, I think it tracks really well with ESB. The great victory from the opening movie reveals vulnerability and removes the threat of clean and instant apocalypse, but doesn’t truly alter the new balance of power (sigh… JJ could have given us a functioning New Republic dealing with an insurgency of its own, but no…). Our chosen one meets a reluctant mentor who eventually acquiesces to train her. She has a troubling but cryptic dark side experience and leaves after learning some but not enough. Hero confronts a dark truth about her history but ultimately can’t truly defeat the villain. Through pluck and sacrifice, our heroes live to fight another day and we are left only with the implication of useful resources (“the fleet” in ESB, the allies who hadn’t yet answered in TLJ).

        Now, I’ll concede the time jump would have needed to be more like ANH->ESB than ESB->ROTJ for it to work, but I also think the set up for an Episode 9 where the call is answered/being answered could work. In Canto Bight we’re made aware that the Alliance/Resistance’s iconography is inspirational, and we learn that the Force is out there, and there are people who want to believe in the cause of both. Additionally, we have a villain who is struggling between the light and the dark, but ultimately rejects both, as he understands them, to make his own path and pursue his own goals, motivated by emotional torment and a tragic sense of abandonment. There’s good bones there, much better than “here’s a hatful of fan theories. Pick one and let’s chase some mcguffins.”

  • Malica@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 days ago

    I really like the 90s Romeo and Juliet, set in present day with the lines unchanged (mostly). I’m alone in this, I think.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m alone in this

      Alone with every single girl coming of age in the 90s who swooned over it cuz of Leo “Heartthrob” DiCaprio.

      I skipped it back in the day but my gf made me watch it last year and I liked it. Very stylish.

        • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 days ago

          Weirdly, I think that is a strength of his performance. Romeo is a misunderstood character: people associate him with romance and chivalry when the Romeo from the play is obsessive, fickle, and impulsive. Kind of a dweeb, really. Juliet fails to see through his bullshit because she is so, so young.

          • Malica@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 days ago

            They’re both annoying af I think that’s half the joke. I’m a big fan of Shakespeare’s sense of humor.

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      That was huge when it came out. Pretty much everyone I knew loved it. I think it only started getting shit on recently.

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m sure there were people who didn’t enjoy it (as can be seen in this thread haha), but even though we didn’t have wikipedia to check at the time I think it was generally known to be big. And checking the stats it opened to box office #1 and then made 10x its budget, and the critics mostly liked it.

          Anyway, it fortunately endures as a triumph for basically anyone who appreciates lit.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I remember someone saying it’s like the Rockstar Games’ version of Romeo & Juliet. I liked it in general, but that 90-second or so prologue always gives me goosebumps.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      It was alright but the fact that they didn’t modernize the language is what ruined the film for me. Who the hell spoke like that in the 90s? It made no sense.

      • sunsofold@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s… that’s the point. It’s Shakespeare’s words given modern visual elements to make it more comprehensible by a modern audience. It’s the prose of Romeo And Juliet that make it Shakespeare, not the swords and doublets.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Yeah and as someone who hated Shakespeare back in my grade school days (and still does), I couldn’t care less about that. I simply want to see a modern take on his plays with the script translated to a prose that I can actually understand.

          As someone with ADHD, it’s difficult enough as-is to focus on words on a page written in a modern dialect, let alone an ancient one! Canterbury Tales was an even worse time for me because of this. I have to be fully invested in the story, or I can’t understand a damn thing in these old manuscripts because my brain refuses to pay attention to anything that isn’t urgent, interesting, or novel to me.

          • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            As someone with ADHD, it’s difficult enough as-is to focus on words on a page written in a modern dialect

            This kinda comes off as someone with red-green color blindness wondering why more paintings aren’t done with primarily blues and yellows.

            I guess if you want modern language you could always watch West Side Story.

          • sunsofold@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            Are you aware you’re asking for something that cannot exist? If you don’t have the Shakespearean prose, it’s not Shakespeare. It’s the identifying element of the thing. You can bend and stretch many aspects of a work, but you can’t remove the identifying elements. For poets, like Shakespeare, their word choice is core to the identity of the work. The ‘story’ is almost meaningless.

            e.g. Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening and Loveliest of Trees have the same ‘story,’ a man takes a moment to appreciate the aesthetic qualities of a treed landscape in winter, but one would never say they were the same thing.

            • Psythik@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Why not? If religious people can update the Bible translations to use modern English, why can’t we do the same with non-religious texts?

              • sunsofold@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 days ago

                Because the goals are different. They aren’t trying to share the poetry of the various original authors of the bible. They are trying to share the stories of the christian mythos to enable/convince people to be christians. We can create things like a movie from a book or translate a book/movie and somewhat call it the same thing (though, even then, it also somewhat isn’t) because the story/plot is the identity of the thing and word choice is considered secondary, but in poetry, so much of what makes a poem itself comes down to individual words and punctuation marks, changing one can be significant, let alone changing the entire text.

  • papalonian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 days ago

    The Star Wars Prequel Trilogy.

    Story time. I’m nearing 30 and had only seen bits and pieces of the original trilogy (not more than 10 minutes or so at a time), and I saw episode 7 in theatre. Last year, my roommate (who is a huge Star Wars fan) and I decided to watch through the whole series. We started with the original, then trudged through the sequels so we could line up the prequel rewatch with the 20th anniversary of episode 3 and see it in theatre.

    I went into it “knowing” that the originals were the best, the sequels were embarrassingly bad, and the prequels were pretty heavily shit on but still decent. I actually ended up liking the prequels more. From a technical standpoint I’d argue that they are probably “worse” movies. There’s the obvious things that don’t make sense (like Anakin being a child in episode one and a young adult in episode two yet Padme looks relatively unchanged) and the dialogue is certainly goofy at times, but I felt a lot more connected to the story and had more fun with the prequels than the originals.

    The sequels were, in fact, absolute dog shit though.

    • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      Really, a lot of the prequel hate comes from them taking such a huge step down from the OT. In 1999, The Phantom Menace was the first major Star Wars film in 16 years; it wasn’t just a cool new thing, it was a cultural event. People expected great things.

      Obviously it failed at that. Not once, but twice. Revenge of the Sith barely even got a chance.

      And so the backlash was brutal. While the critique wasn’t unfair in its points, it also came from a perspective of starkly emotional disappointment. People say the prequels are looked at more fondly now due to ‘nostalgia’, but mostly I think it’s that the emotional pain has faded and we can analyze them more objectively as flawed, but ultimately solid films rather than ‘disasters’.

      It may be that one day the sequels will be more coldly studied as well, with more focus placed on the issues produced by cycling directorship and management pressures… but I also think even a coldly analytical appraisal of them will still come up as “hollow and emotionless”.

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        flawed, but ultimately solid films rather than ‘disasters’.

        I think they might still be at least verging on disasters, though certainly more interesting ones than JJ’s movies (see elsewhere in this thread for my thoughts on TLJ). The PT actually reminds me a lot of other passion projects (Megalopolis is probably the most recent, and surprise surprise, Coppola is a friend and mentor) that reveal the limitations of deferring to the auteur’s singular vision in a collaborative artform.

        The “saved in the edit” narrative for ANH is disingenuous I think, inserting a miracle for a particularly strong example of how the workflow for a weird project should work, but it does hint at the truth that somebody like Lucas has as many bad ideas as good ones, and only the ones he can sell to fellow respected professionals should stay in the final product.

        I also think it’s fair to say that because he was frustrated by the “compromises” with actors, writers, directors, and studios who all felt they were equal stakeholders, the unfiltered Lucas was a jarring departure from the OT, yet ostensibly targeted the exact same demographics, and that made it even harder to evalute the PT on its own terms. For me personally, I could never truly get over the stilted line readings that felt exactly like the cheesy serials that Lucas loved, but that the New Hollywood “kids” and British stage veterans refused to let infect the OT. “You can write this shit, George, but you can’t say it.”

    • MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      The sequels have a bipolar plot, it gives you whiplash seeing the tonal shift and direction change each movie goes through.

      The prequels are definitely flawed (George, how much political mumbo jumbo do you really think people want to see in their space wizard drama?) but they have a more or less coherent story. You can see how A>B>C and it makes sense.

      Plus, the absolute memefest that the prequels turned into has helped a ton.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’ve never understood the hate for the prequels. I thought The Phantom Menace was kind of boring and I’ve never successfully removed Jar Jar’s voice from my head, but I straight up liked Attack of The Clones and Revenge of The Sith.

    • mursejoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      The prequels are the only Star Wars movies that I regularly rewatch. The other 6 are never on at our house, and the spin off movies are completely ignored.

        • wjrii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Rogue One has some banger set-pieces, and it’s a decent enough war movie in Star Wars cosplay, but while it’s fun to watch it after Andor, doing so also really underlined to me how thin and overhyped I think it was.

  • BurgerBaron@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 days ago

    I enjoy Gods of Egypt, even have the Bluray. It’s a dogshit movie but good junk food entertainment. Kinda gives me The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen vibes which is another crap movie I like.

    Not sure why, I think I’m just a sucker for ancient Egyptian themes even when they’re butchered to the point of being insulting.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 days ago

      The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen vibes which is another crap movie

      Awwww man, I really liked that movie. I wanted to see more on their take of captain nemo

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      I love those pulpy swing-for-the-fences ideas too. Sometimes people forget not everything has to be high cinema or literature.

      Sometimes we just want some imaginative adventure that takes us away from the mundane drudgery.

    • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      That’s one of those shows that I can’t even remember anymore because Abridged just overwrote it in my brain.

    • tacosanonymous@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      I watched it fresh back in the day and I liked it too.

      The one thing that really gets me is that in a world that loves gaming, they didn’t have a regulating body or at least Gamers’ Nexus to look over the headset and say, “this could fucking kill someone.” I get that it would kill the entire franchise but I feel like they could have tried harder.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Honestly i really liked the relationships in it. The premise is really good too. I get why the later seasons just didnt deliver the same though.

  • mittyta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m fine with Harry Potter.

    I see a lot of hate on the author, I almost don’t know what it’s about. And don’t want to know. I still enjoy books and movies. And will show it to my child. I’m OK with separating the art from the artist.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      9 days ago

      I remember feeling kind of like you some years back and thinking surely this is just drama from terminally online people right? But then I finally did look into it and consider it and I did conclude that the woman really is a huge asshole.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Yeah, in the same month of this year she threatened to sue amnesty international forcing them to take down a report and posted an upskirt of someone she had a problem with. These aren’t the most evil things she’s done, but they are some real “are we the baddies” moments

    • belluck@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      You can separate the art from the artist as long as you don’t give her any more money. She’s actively using her wealth to hurt trans people. The new TV series was made just to spite the original actors because they’ve publicly denounced her views and supported trans people.

      • mursejoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        I think the high seas is the only ethical way to enjoy her content. I have my childhood hard covers but I’ll never give her money now. She seems truly evil. That’s coming from a Slythern!

    • 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      The art is problematic in itself.

      • Goblin banker look like antisemitic caricatures.
      • house-elves want to be slaves because it’s their nature and Hermione is ridiculed for trying to free them
      • the Irish guy is called Seamus Finnigan and like to blow up stuff
      • the French girl is pretty and mean.
      • the Eastern European guy is quiet an angry
      • the red-haired family is poor and has a lot of children
      • the Asian girl is smart and called „Cho Chang“
      • …

      It’s just another iteration of the Heroes Journey in a nice (except for the racism) setting.

      Edit: read Alanna by Tamora Pierce. Much better.

      • gastroglizzy@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 days ago

        Don’t forget all the talk of blood purity and the state, media, education system, and prisons all being operated by the same tight-knit group of people for generations.

        • Starya67@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yes. That’s the point. It’s about Nazis, fascism, the KKK (pointy hats, helloooooo) etc. Which is why it’s so weird that she’s joined the people who she says were bad.

          That list above is bullshit. There’s no need to make anything up. Just stick to the truth. The woman’s behaviour is appalling.

      • the_blast_of_us@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        +1 for Alanna. My wife loved the books growing up so much that we named our first kid after the main character and I subsequently got a fairly big Alanna tattoo.

      • mittyta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Wow, cool. Hasn’t saw any problems in the art itself. Now see, thank you.

        Anyway almost all of that is Supporting roles at best. I know I will get minuses for this comment too.

        I still will watch it with my daughter, when she will apply to elementary school. And as others suggested, I will not pay money for that. Thank you, guys.

      • feannag@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        I’d recommend just about all the Tortall books by Tamora Pierce (except Mastiff. Hate that book).

    • Starya67@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      She’s a raging TERF and proud of it. I know you didn’t want to know, but please don’t give that woman any money.

      I’m a massive Harry Potter fan, by the way. I can separate the art from the artist and despise the artist at the same time. See also Dickens, Dahl, Wagner, Scott Card, etc.

    • yyprum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      The author is terrible, as a person, and really as a writer too. The books are not examples of great literature, but they are kid’s books, they don’t have to be. What is super important is that those books helped a lot of kids to become more interested in reading. Just for that, the books have worth in my mind, and they are pretty enjoyable in a way, and they don’t have in them the hatred the author has nowadays, which is good.

      The movies are the work of many people, not just hers, and they show real love and have a certain magic in them on how they did the worldbuilding and everything. I wished more of the main people involved in the movies would speak against the authror though.

      But please don’t ignore what the author does. Don’t avoid it. I am ok separating art from artist, but while the artist is alive and is affecting the world I feel it is important to be aware of what we buy and where we put the money to the best of our ability. There are many ways to enjoy something without giving money to a person full of hatred.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Not sure why you’re getting downvoted.

      Every single person downvoting you likes art from an artist that’s a piece of shit. It’s inevitable. And you didn’t indicate you still financially support the artist, which is what everyone is concerned about. And you shouldn’t, because she’s a real piece of shit.

  • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 days ago

    Civ VII. Every version makes changes and people scream and shout - and I’m sure many legitimately don’t like the changes. But I do. I started with Civ IV and I liked V, VI, and now VII.

    • Balisada@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      I hated Civ VII when it first came out. If I start out as Rome, then I will play through to the end of the game as Rome. I tried several times to go through the empire change, but my options were always countries that I have never heard of or ones that I really had no interest in playing.

      Now that they updated it, I haven’t tried playing again. I did like the game other than that.

      I should try again. I really do like the franchise.

      • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        I usually stick with the same civ, but not always. The variety is fun.

        And I have mixed feelings about the two main options on keeping your stuff or not. Both are actually fun.

        But I do play with some mods - including cheat ones, although I usually just cheat enough diplomacy so as to be able to participate with all the incoming diplomatic requests, and some limited gold, and sometimes to cheat unit movement (like if I want to adjust my starting area, or if I’m just frustrated with an enemy and I’m like “fuck it, you’re out” lol)