🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞

Listen, kid, I’ve been on reddit since 2009. I hung out with the admins in IRC back in the day. I was a default mod for a while, and I’m the “father” of /r/nottheonion.

There’s plenty I don’t know about reddit and life in general, but on this topic, clearly I know a fuck ton more than you.

There was a time on reddit when self-promotion was against the rules. That rule was dropped something like a decade ago.

The simple fact is that - from at least the article’s telling - the subreddits wanted the content, and in that case, it is absolutely fine and encouraged for someone to submit.

There’s a guy making youtube reviews of restaurants in my local city’s subreddit. The content is popular - people like it. So we absolutely are happy to see him post. Is it self-promotion? Yes, technically. It’s also relevant to the subreddit and desired by the mods and members of the subreddit.

You’re like the people saying “dis a repost” when someone CROSS-posts. Note that reddit has a BUILT IN SYSTEM for cross-posting, but there are redditors who don’t know that.

So, little boy, you can take your condescension and /r/confidentlyincorrect along with /r/iamverysmart and fucking LEARN something, or go off and continue to be willfully ignorant.

Disclaimer: If the article’s reporting is incorrect and the subreddits considered it spam, well, that’s not what the article said, and I don’t otherwise have other knowledge of it, nor do I care enough to google for any other possible sources. But that’s the informatio you’re working off of as well, so there’s that.

PS: To add a light-hearted end: I’ll go to /r/dontyouknowwhoiam now :) (that name seems too long. Is that the right one/ Well, you probably know what I mean and I’m too lazy to look it up :P )

atta k

I feel weird that I read this correctly. hehe

But now that you mention it, I wonder if they’ll launch during the rebuttal. :|

wut

Unless the article is absolutely lying, it mentioned the subreddits wanted the posts and couldn’t overcome the sitewide ban (i.e. manually approving the content). Your comment is a really huge stretch there.

Mine came from simply saying that a drone would probably take care of a Russian solder seen in a video on crutches heading toward the front lines in Ukraine. Literally just that. Not saying it with any joy or approval, just a statement of fact. Phrased pretty damn much like I said it in this comment here.

Like you just did with your comment and OP did with their posting: non paid ad posting

That’s a whole load of whataboutism bullshit.

if you’re wanting to wash it at home,

The AI should absolutely understand the implication that you want to wash your car at the car wash, not at home. The prompt is clear about that, even though it is implied.

“I want a hamburger. McDonald’s is three miles from me and Wendy’s is five miles. Which is the cheaper place to get a burger from when you consider the distance to each?” is not an exact analogy, but the point is that it should be ABSOLUTELY clear that you do not wish to make your own hamburger. Any response that discusses that as an option is ridiculout, unless maybe it’s one of those options-at-the-end thing LLMs love to do - but it has no part of the main answer at all.

You have to have the car there no matter what type of car wash it is.

If the car wash is some distance “away”, it means neither you nor the car is at it. Any attendant is not going to walk off-property to retreive your car, especially when most of them you drive up for service. Which is rather the point.

I’m not afraid to say that it took me a sec. My brain went “short distance. Walk or drive?” and skipped over the car wash bit at first. Then I laughed because I quickly realized the idiocy. :shrug:

If this wasn’t true, then the war would be over and Russia would have no gains.

What fucking bullshit spin is this bullshit? Ukraine is fucking successfully defending itself against Russia, you fucking muppet. Russia, with supposedly the second best military in the world, can’t even fucking win a war in Ukraine, who is somewhere supposedly down in the list?

You are absolutely laughable and pitiful.

Or make Vance do the meetings

And sometimes what one of us thinks isn’t true.

Seems to me they’re still standing firm. How much territory have they lost recently? Fighting for their lives, they’re still holding on, and they’re continuing to survive with the help from the US all but cut off.

You may claim to feel bad for them, but it sure sounds like you’re like Trump - suggesting they give in to the terrorist Russians.

But a quick peek at your posting history shows you love to vocally block people. So go ahead and block me and be done with it.

https://archive.ph/gP6Yr

I’m also suspicious that the ransonware attack had anything to do with AI, but I didn’t want to say so because going against the common consensus in threads like this gets me downvoted, so I’d rather not say it if people aren’t going to consider it (and then agree or disagree). heh

Then again, as a user of emdashes^[1] — I suppose I’m under suspucion of being an LLM as well. ;-)

Would you like me to compose responses to any other comments in this thread?^[2]

Well. It would be the zeroth law, first of all, but the three laws would most definitely not allow humans to die.

The whole point of I, Robot was cases where the three laws were circumvented in various ways.

Anarchism is the solution.

Mmmm, I’m sorry to see this getting upvotes. Anarchism is great in theory, but the entire point of a government is to protect the weak, take from those that can afford and provide social safety nets for those who cannot.

Even with our broken democracy, a lot of that still works, even though a lot more is broken.

The solution to our broken democracy is not a lack of government completely.

People bitch about government bloat and inefficiency, but you know what’s worse? Corporations with unfettered ability to maximise profit even more than they do now. The shitty limited regulations we have now? Gone in anarchy.

Anarchy is rule by the strongest.

It’d be great if we lived in some Star Trek future where everyone cooperated. But we don’t. I wish anarchy worked.

Mission. Fucking. Accomplished.

Hehe

WRONG. Someone is WRONG on the internet and I MUST right that wrong!

;-)

Yes, I understand the theory. And it’s fine to discuss speculation, because that could turn out to be the case.

But I also brought up glasses because not everything the body has done to survive is something that can’t be changed.

We’ll have to see what happens when we turn up the immune system.

As a hopefuly kidney transplant candidate at some point… I’m very interested as I know after a transplant, I have to take things to suppress my immune system, so I particularly suspect for that reason I might not be able to benefit from this new thing… but I hope I’m wrong :)