• melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    6 days ago

    “AI businesses are putting profits over sanity and safety”.

    Remove “AI” from that sentence and you’ll see that’s just more normal business practices that have been going on for decades.

    • seejur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      The real question is: what profit? It’s a sink hole in a hope to maximize reach

      • yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        Ho, you can trust OpenAI and Nvidia to make a profit. You and your pension funds? What pension funds?

      • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        This is a ball and cup game designed to create cashflow where there is none. The ‘profit’ is the assets, dividends and capital gains the shareholder class will syphon out before the bubble bursts.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    7 days ago

    If anybody leaves an AI company with a fat paycheck, promises to “be honest about the real problems,” and then proceeds to regurgitate things the AI company CEOs say: be suspicious.

    Exhibit A is Anthropic millionaire Mrinank Sharma, who only mentioned (future) peril from AI and AI-made bioweapons, two fictional scenarios on the short list that Anthropic officially endorses. It’s a list of things that please Anthropic investors.

    Real-world stuff like AI psychosis, poisoning people’s air, or generating CSAM doesn’t get a mention from him. There’s no profit in acknowledging those things, so he won’t.

    • melfie@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 days ago

      Maybe Claude Code learned this from its creators: I’ve noticed that when it says “the real issue is…”, that means it has no clue and is about barf out a bunch of slop that I’m going to have to revert.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yep there is a deep attachment amongst AI boosters to certain doom and gloom scenarios that stem from their philosophical “think tanks” which use imaginary problems (e.g. “AGI ‘misalignment’ destroying the world through turning everything into paperclips”) to lobby and alter our laws to benefit their real bosses – anthropic, open ai, and friends.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is many companies right now.

    Mine is run from the top down (all executives) by people who use LLM’s for fucking everything.

    Everyone fucking hates them at this point. We all think they are fucking trash.

    • 123@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not in my experience. Once their clients budgets get cut by funding cuts due to reality and they notice it doesn’t do anything of benefit (on the clients side), they will be all “client first”.

  • trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Define “talent”. Software developers focused on squeezing llms into everything regardless of necessity? I’m likely jaded as an infra monkey but you’ll have to pay me x3 as much to fix your broken servers after the bubble pops.

  • suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    Publicly traded companies are legally required to put profits over sanity, safety, and everything else. It’s a truly insane system we’ve put together for ourselves.

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    Every company does that. The difference is the AI companies will be broke soon and laying off all their staff so people are getting out before the collapse.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Exactly. And some of them are rats fleeing a sinking ship. Just look at Mrinank Sharma, who got paid a million bucks or so for a year at Anthropic, then ditched.