• PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    So because they criticized the wrong military that one time, we don’t have to care about political prisoners in Bhutan? Convenient.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          The main issue was takes like “The Ukrainian army should station itself in forests instead of defending cities so that Russian bombardment would not hit civilians”. Anyone with a single strategically thinking brain cell of course readily sees that if you’re not defending cities, the Russians would’ve been free to Bucha everything.

          They somehow misunderstood the “no human shields” thing as “you can’t be near civilians, ever”. You need to be close to civilians if you want to protect them from massacres. How else are you supposed to do that, with telepathy?

          • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            They talked much shit about how Ukraine treated POWs but was completely silent about how Russia treated Ukrainian POWs

            Is that so?

            Russian authorities have subjected Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) and civilian captives to torture, prolonged incommunicado detention, enforced disappearance and other inhumane treatment, which amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity, Amnesty International said in a new report today.