• I_Jedi@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        15 days ago

        Aha! Excellent question! The reason why human decency is considered evil is very simple.

        When Jesus escaped the cross and purged everyone who tried to kill him at Golgotha, he explained that forgiveness, mercy, and humility are weaknesses of the human condition. If you feel someone has crossed you, then you are obligated by the LORD to get revenge, or you would be committing the mortal sin of mercy.

        Observe Figure A down below. The evil ones who perverted Christ’s message favor the straight cross, since they believe that he actually wanted humans to be humble, forgiving, and weak. The true followers use this bent ends variant, which demonstrates how Christ changed his mind after the Romans failed to kill him.

        • DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          Is this a shitpost? I can’t find any evidence of any of this. Is this like some fringe version of Christianity like the Rosicrucians or something?

          I feel like I’m missing a joke.

          • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            15 days ago

            There’s a massive silent /s at the end of that. It’s pointing out how warped conservative culture Christian ideology is, that they’re preaching the exact opposite of what Jesus actually taught, under a nazi symbol.

            • DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              15 days ago

              Thank you lol Its really hard to distinguish that especially on something like Lemmy because so many people will actually believe and post about the most insane shit and be 100% sincere about it.

          • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            15 days ago

            It’s the “Inquisitor Cycle” variant of Christianity. I don’t think they have an official name, so…yeah.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    15 days ago

    As far as this position on the issues, I’m pretty sure this was already a majority opinion anyway?

    That kind of thing - polling on issues that actually fucking matter to everyone - is exactly why the Republicans work so hard to try to paint the Democratic Party as trying to make everyone transgender and have men competing in every single K-12 female sports event…

    Suddenly we are arguing over “bathroom bills” and “men in women’s sports” instead of about things on which there is majority support, but which the oligarchs oppose.

    • tmyakal@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      men competing in every single K-12 female sports event

      I kind of do want this, though? Like, not every event, but every once in a while let’s have a soccer match of a team of 6 year old girls versus a couple of middle-aged men. Just to see what happens.

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Hey, if Musk can make “everything computer” why can’t I make everything transgender?

  • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    15 days ago

    Dem voters have been to the left of Dem leadership for at least a couple of decades now. But the big corporate donors don’t want policies that help people. They want neocon subjugation.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    15 days ago

    Don’t worry, theres still plenty of time for the democratic party/DNC to fuck everything up in favor of the republicans-from-40-years-ago democrats.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    14 days ago

    THESE are the Things that Democrat Voters WANT and will WILLINGLY vote for? Well I GUESS we have NO Choice but to TRY and Court MAGA votes!

    -James Carville!

  • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    15 days ago

    It should just be the progressive party. I’m so done with the bullshit that changes nothing of the status quo that everyone is unhappy with.

    This is the best time for it to be implemented. The next president will have the biggest opportunity to make huge sweeping disruptive changes. I just don’t think the democrats have the balls to force it like they will be able to with the sweep.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    15 days ago

    Prosecuting the facsists and making sure this crap can’t happen again is essential. Focus on that motherfuckers.

  • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    That’s great! Just keep your hands off firearms for law abiding citizens and you’ll have my vote.

    Edit: since some users here are confused on politics… In the U.S. there are such things as liberal gun owners. Come shooting with us sometime and you can see why we hate fascism.

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Man, if we convince every single issue gun rights voter that the left is actually pro gun - shit, we could go bring justice to the pedophiles by next week. Fuck voting at that point.

      Seriously though. We literally have our own version of the NRA on the left, the SRA. Any self respecting leftist owns at least one firearm.

      • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        That’s hilarious coming from a Canadian where it’s difficult to get or even keep anything other than a pellet gun.

        • AnotherWastedHuman@retrolemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 days ago

          If your guns – that you presumably virtually never need to use – are such a ridiculously high priority to you, then your priorities are seriously out of whack. Especially since nobody’s trying to take them from you unless you’re mentally unfit to have them. Or is that the real reason for your “concern?”

          • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            15 days ago

            Hobbyists don’t need guns at all. And, in order to preserve game species for future generations, hunters should be limited to using Stone Age bows with flint-tipped arrows, spears from the same era, and (in a bow to modernity) Louisville Sluggers, but only for bears over 1/4 of a ton.

            As for self-defense, do something useful like learning situational awareness.

            • AnotherWastedHuman@retrolemmy.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              15 days ago

              Can’t rebut my argument (or won’t, which may be telling), so you lamely try to move the goalposts. Hard to take you seriously after that. What happened in those places isn’t going to happen here anytime soon (at least not with regard to guns). There are plenty of other much more pressing issues that should be higher in your priory list.

              BTW in case you didn’t notice, I’m not the person you were talking to a couple comments back.

                • AnotherWastedHuman@retrolemmy.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  Riiggghhhhttttt. Ignoring the fact that the distant future is almost completely unpredictable makes people less skeptical. Make sense.

                  🙄

                  For those of us grounded in reality, the likelihood of gun ownership being forbidden anytime in the foreseeable future – especially when there are so many millions of people out there with them already – is extremely unlikely.

                  At the risk of sounding like a “think of the children” argument (which, ironically, that side of the political spectrum loves to misuse), I don’t believe anyone sane wants mentally unfit people to have access to guns.

    • save_the_humans@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Its a conservative supreme court, you don’t have to be a single issue voter. Progressive candidates can try to make promises to get elected, but no ones going to be able to take your guns away. Even a progressive court wouldn’t be able to do that much. A law for background checks or waiting periods on purchases might be upheld by a progressive court, but the right ultimately won’t be infringed.