This ad just popped up and it should be more infuriating than just mildly, But it’s more of Google being Google. How many different tiers of YouTube are there now so Alphabet can skim off slightly higher margins from each user possible? Premium LITE? Really? And I am just tickled by the fact that the main perk is not that it removes ads but that there will be slightly less of them. “Pay us to watch ads” Is the new corporate standard.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    3 days ago

    There was a rule back in the 90s that the more words were used in the title of the software the worse it was. Adobe Photoshop was good. Corel DrawMaker 3.5 for Windows 98 Special Edition was crap.

  • sigezayaq@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    they are trying so hard for people to pay for AI that they have to include unrelated stuff in the package lmao

  • osanna@lemmy.vg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 days ago

    lmao. I haven’t seen a youtube ad in years, and I use it almost all day, and yet, I don’t pay anything for it.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have found I use less of things they make inaccessible. They took reddit away and I have been fine, for once people are talking to me and I havent already read the top comments on the topic. Their move to block old.reddit.com will probably get rid of the last bits I use it for, the odd movie review thread or search for a wank.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Then get iOS and run yt plus. Quite literally iOS users CAN still run adless youtube even though it’s a bit of a hack (refresh every 7 days via SideStore app on your phone unless you have a dev membership)

        Or the better solution if you care about privacy and freedom over convenience, get an Android phone with an openable bootloader. Preferably one that’s not a Pixel.

        • Starya67@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          My next phone will be a Fairphone, but I’m not made of money so I’m stuck with my Samsung atm.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Haven’t kept up with the Android ecosystem after moving to iOS. I hear GrapheneOS is working with Motorola to support an upcoming phone of theirs if you’re privacy minded (GrapheneOS) and don’t want a Pixel (only device it currently runs on)

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          it genuinely makes me a bit angry that y’all never mention lineage, why are you ignoring by far the most normalized and usable android distribution??

          • sunnyjim@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I just wasn’t aware that Lineage is degoogled, that’s all.

            It’s not some conspiracy against Lineage, Lineage seems great. Haven’t used it in a while but that’s just because I use e/OS personally.

            • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              being degoogled is kinda the point of lineage 😭 i don’t hate /e/os and the other stuff but holy hell they seem to have completely buried the existence of lineage and it feels so fucking strange and not good

  • Chais@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wow, I could get that thing I don’t care for by paying for that other thing I don’t care for. What a great deal.

  • eezeebee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 days ago

    I prefer YouTube Premium Plus Silver tier. It still has ads, but they are premium ads, which I find go down my throat more smoothly. Anything less makes me gag.

    • StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The premium ads are selected based off of your habits to ensure their products that you’ll love. (In small text) if you go more than a week without purchasing one of these products there will be an additional charge

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Buy this other ludicrous thing from us that you don’t want for partial benefit on this other thing you hate!”

  • darkmarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Pay us and watch ads” has been around a long time. That’s what cable tv was. We’ve gone full circle.

    One day, something new will come along and kill streaming in the same way streaming did cable. Once things get this fragmented, something else always comes along to replace it, and the cycle will repeat.

    It will be cheap, easy to use, and everyone will switch. Once enough people move over, the big corporations will get involved and the enshitification will begin. It will be adveetised to death, segmented, and people will look for an alternative.

  • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    the main perk is not that it removes ads but that there will be slightly less of them.

    It does remove ads in most videos, just not in Shorts, or on music videos. The whole deal is they’re essentially un-bundling a music subscription from YT Premium, which makes it cheaper, and is then better if you, say, watch YouTube, but already use Spotify for your music.

    Essentially, you don’t see any ads when you watch videos, AKA no midrolls, but you might see a small banner ad above the list of next suggested videos to the right of the video player, and if you constantly scroll shorts they might toss some ads in there as well.

    Personally, as someone who doesn’t use YouTube for music, and doesn’t like scrolling shorts, I see this as perfectly reasonable as a way to reduce the cost, especially when you can click the Theater mode button on any video to block out the majority of the suggested videos area by default before any sidebar ad would even make it on your screen.

  • ryper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The tier makes sense, if not the name. Google insists on including music streaming in Youtube Premium, and Premium Lite is a cheaper tier that doesn’t include music streaming. It’s missing some other features too, but it beats Premium for people who just want to not have ads and for some reason won’t use an ad blocker.

    This support page about Premium Lite says it has no ads on “most non-music content, excluding Shorts. Ads may appear when you search or browse”. Still having ads on music content makes sense given that Premium Lite doesn’t include music streaming.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      and Premium Lite is a cheaper tier that doesn’t include music streaming.

      But… Youtube is a bunch of audio-only, video-only and <resolution>-with-audio streams either way. So it’s just an app thing?

      • ryper@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Premium includes Google’s equivalent of paid Spotify. Premium Lite and free users get something closer to Spotify’s free tier.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      You forgot to mention that it doesn’t allow for mobile queuing either. That was what made me drop my sub as a whole instead of just downgrading. I would rather just use ad block style services such as gray-jay than experience mobile youtube without the ability to queue videos. I use it heavily for going to sleep, and with how finicky the auto play system is for choosing what video it should play next, there’s no way I trust it to not absolutely screw my suggested videos.

      • huppakee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Spotify has a lot of content that’s great for falling a sleep, tons of curated playlists and you can queue audio (i’m assuming your not actually watching videos anyway). O and also, if you let Spotify auto-play it never effects your suggested content on YouTube.