• supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Genocide Profiteer not War Profiteer

    Fuck you Microsoft, if I wasn’t already done with you for completely enshittifying your operating system, I would DEFINITELY be done with you for this.

    Fuck off and continue to become a Kodak or Yahoo or other still existing washout company that totally lost the plot.

  • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    4 days ago

    “I’m not interested in arguing” -someone who knows they’re in the wrong, but still holds the power

  • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    256
    ·
    4 days ago

    the email to Aboussad reads. “It is also concerning that you have not apologized to the company, and in fact you have shown no remorse for the effect that your actions have had and will have.”

    Obviously there were going to fire these employees, especially the one who gave notice then did this.

    But why the fuck would anyone be like “yOu DiDn’T eVeN aPoLoGiZe To ThE cOmPaNy”? That’s the stupidest god damn thing I’ve heard since “Liberation Day”

    • FourWaveforms@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      4 days ago

      That email was almost certainly written by lawyers with the intention of supporting MS in court, should it come down to that.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        Bingo. Lots of stupid things at this level boil down to legal protection. You’ll see it everywhere once you learn and look.

        • parody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          “Lucky we’re not countersuing! Oh the damages you are certain to be causing in the futureeee, the burns”

          Actually now that I think about it maybe this was a multimillion dollar protest. The headlines have been published for and wide. I bet a few people spent more time feeling guilty than working right after as well - imagine one of them quitting. Still somewhat hard to believe it would lose them contracts but perhaps there will be potential customers who want to avoid connection with Microsoft until this blows over.

      • binom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        that makes sense. i hate the fact that such a blatant play at covering your bases could hold up in any court. no matter the legal fineprint, it takes two functioning braincells to realise what’s going on here

    • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Hey, when’s the last time you showed remorse to your multi-trillion market cap employer? Next you’re gonna tell me something really outrageous like you didn’t even swear an oath of fealty to them.

    • seeigel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      But why the fuck would anyone be like “yOu DiDn’T eVeN aPoLoGiZe To ThE cOmPaNy”?

      Frame the debate. MS doesn’t have to justify their profiteering if they can talk about the employee. The attention span of the public is limited.

  • binom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    It is also concerning that you have not apologized to the company, and in fact you have shown no remorse for the effect that your actions have had and will have.

    the fucking audacity. i mean, we all knew how it would end, but talk about 5d reverse psychology mindgames

      • SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        It doesn’t seem they are using free speech in the same sense as the American first amendment (they may not be from the USA). But i would argue that if companies want to play politics, run countries, and be that integrated in people’s lives then free speech as a concept should extend to companies.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          As a not-American we don’t say we have freedom of speech, we say we have protected speech and that is more inline with what you want

      • DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Shhhhh… Get out of here with your nuance. Let them screech about the bad private company violating the First Amendment.

        It makes the monkeys feel better.

        Edit:

        • skisnow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          That was the opposite of nuance. It was pedantry that deliberately missed the point.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Let them screech about the bad private company violating the First Amendment.

          How many billions of dollars in government contracts do you need to receive before the line blurs? Microsoft might as well be a subsidiary of the Federal Bureaucracy, given the role it plays in national security, infrastructure, and data management. The US government is its biggest client by far.

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    He’s not wrong, but ‘bringing your true self to work’ is something companies like to say but they don’t actually believe.

  • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    4 days ago

    IBM had a role in the holocaust. Those numbers tattooed on everyone in the concentration camp? Those were IBM ID numbers for the punch cards.

    If IBM staff protested about their role, it’s been lost to history. But it’s repeating today with Gaza and the staff who speak out are being demonized. Israel’s Lavender AI is being used to kill civilians. History will prove this woman and the other employees right in the end.

    • EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, I assume the now-former employee acted with full expectation of losing her job over this. She succeeded at bringing attention to something many people (myself included) hadn’t heard about before, so she at least accomplished that much.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    4 days ago

    the best thing i did was spend last month deleting the partitions in my desktop and laptop and installing mint.

    • SilentObserver@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve been on Arch for a little while now, and Kubuntu before that. After Valve launched Proton on Steam, I found myself almost never booting into Windows. Once I ran out of disk space, it was an easy decision to completely purge Windows from my machine. Haven’t looked back in years.

      Fuck Microsoft for trying to control my computer. Finally nice not having it reinstall Candy Crush after every update. And none of that copilot or online account bullshit.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s such a nice thing about Linux and FOSS in general. The issues you run into are different than what you may be used to with Windows, but at least the system and its developers aren’t working against you.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          And if you don’t like the way one distro does things, you can switch to another one, and there are dozens to choose from. With Windows, of course there is only one distro, and if you don’t like it, too bad.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Heck yeah. Once in installed Mint on my PC at home, it was only a matter of weeks before I double checked my backed up files and nuked my windows partition.

      I still have the windows partition at work that I never use, and I have heard some bad stories about machines getting wiped when IT upgrades people to win11, so it might just have a little accident in its sleep.

  • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    4 days ago

    I would have been surprised if they hadn’t fired her. Good on those two for causing a ruckus for a cause they believe in though. Nonviolent one too, well done.

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      4 days ago

      They were probably going to quit over personal morality anyway, so good for them for using their exit for positive. At least they can leave with their self-respect and dignity intact, and the respect of their co-workers and the world. Somewhere there is a moral employer who will appreciate them.

  • MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    4 days ago

    The fact that they’re asking her to apologize is Just ass backwards.

    They should apologize, and look into the issue, and possibly, stop, war profiting.

    That’s okay. They’re going to lose a lot of Windows users, forcing them to upgrade Perfectly good computers.

    • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      i agree with what you’re saying from an ethical standpoint. i think she’s right to protest.

      but it’s not “an issue”, it’s a huge fucking client of theirs. from a business standpoint its a huge ask to fire a whole military as a customer.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 days ago

        Surely there’s an option between “drop major client” and “punish the person pointing out problems”

          • Psycoder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            Not only will they fire her, they will also be less willing to hire other Palestinians in the future.

            I don’t know about Microsoft but a FAANG company I worked for had very well documented means of raising ethical or legal issues within the company. She just violated her employment contract and possibly her NDA with the company by doing this.

            I don’t mean to say she is right/wrong. It is just that she did not follow the guidelines of the company she works for. Therefore she will be fired even if she is right/wrong.

        • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          So a choice between money and ethics.
          There is never any question which one companies choose.
          Certainly not the one with a carreer in scumbaggery.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 days ago

        “We cant stop selling to war criminals. They are among our biggest customers.”

        Sounds more like a company that needs to be dismantled and have their leadership face prison sentences. Given the size of Microsoft they could take the hit economically w.o. much hassle. They dont have to be evil. They want to be evil. And we need to punish them for it by boycotting their shit as much as possible.

    • SilentObserver@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      I wish that were the case. But I doubt most people will ditch Windows. They’ll just pony up for a new computer. They’ll certainly lose some users. But Windows will still remain as top dog, most likely. And I doubt that’ll ever change so long as traditional desktop computers and laptops still exist.

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Windows isn’t the issue here. The war profiteering is coming from the AI and cloud divisions

        • SilentObserver@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Ok cool. But I was replying to the comment regarding Microsoft forcing new computers on people. So no need for the correction.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Only trouble is Microsoft clearly doesn’t care about negative reviews of their applications, because they’ve been receiving negative reviews for years now.

      It’s not like you can even avoid using their products, personally you can install Linux but you’re probably going to still have to use a Windows device at work, and business is where they make most of their profit anyway.

      • nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s mildly entertaining at times to scroll through the reviews of the HEIF Image Extension in the Microsoft Store. Microsoft doesn’t care one bit how bad they are.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, work is where they get you. I’m fortunate to be able to use Linux at work too, but the company is still paying for my M365 account which I use in a browser for meetings and communication.

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        They still have presence in for example the Play store. A review can cost little time to place, yet it can affect a lot. Though avoid mentioning certain words censored by the play store.

        • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Is “id rather take a shot to the back of the throat from Andy Dick, than be stuck using Microsoft Office” approved for the app store?

  • TarantulaFudge@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    4 days ago

    Microsoft has policy that prevents it from retaliatory actions against human rights violations. Court should rule Microsoft violated its own policies…

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      prevents it from retaliatory actions against human rights violations

      They can’t retaliate if someone violates human rights?

      • taipan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        They’re referencing what the second protester (Vaniya Agrawal) mentioned in her email:

        Know that Microsoft’s human rights statement prohibits retaliation against anyone who raises a human rights-related concern: Human rights statement | Microsoft CSR

        The Microsoft Global Human Rights Statement has a “Foundational principles” section that says:

        Our commitment to human rights defenders: Our commitment to respecting and advancing human rights includes respect and support for the work of human rights defenders around the world. Human rights defenders are people who, individually or with others, engage in activities and advocacy that contribute to the protection of human rights and the rule of law, good governance, tolerance, and diversity and inclusion. Human rights defenders face persistent physical, social, economic, and psychological threats. Microsoft does not tolerate threats, intimidation, retaliation, physical, legal or cyber-attacks against human rights defenders. This commitment extends to all human rights defenders, including those working on issues related to Microsoft and those exercising their rights of freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly, including to challenge or protest aspects of our own business.

        Microsoft is clearly declining to fulfill its commitment as it is written in its statement.