In the owner’s manual, it says you consent to data collection by driving the car and if you don’t consent, you should return the car to the nearest dealer.

Why does “some kind of enforcement” need to involve violating the privacy of everyone, including people who don’t drive like dangerous cunts? Do you really think there’s no other way to enforce traffic laws?

The best example I’ve heard is, if I wait outside your house and follow you around everywhere you go, every single time you leave the house, even though you’re “in public,” that’s still a crime and it’s called “stalking.”

🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮 🌮

“Microsoft thinks it has social permission to burn the planet for profit” is all I’m hearing.

Not worth it getting all the Korok seeds in BotW

Hey, that’s not fair. If you complete the original 150 Pokedex, you also get a little diploma you can print on your GameBoy Printer.

Lol. Lmao.

The techno feudalists and their demented puppet are sabotaging the country quite effectively

Don’t threaten me with a good time

may

admins

Fuck Microsoft

No joke, the day after it happened, they said they were gonna wait a week to even vote on whether or not he was allowed to do it.

No worries, friend. Good on you for making sure.

Titanic sub was made from carbon fiber. Titanium is what he should have used.

Well, I’d really like not being fed slop. Quit serving it to me, and I’ll quit complaining.

Depending on where you live, being armed with four shots of bourbon in you may not be legal.

This is what I’m talking about; for some reason, even US citizens think we have no gun control laws whatsoever.

The gun laws enforcement agencies talk about not enforcing are the “assault weapon” bans. The reason they don’t want to do that is because these laws set a dangerous precedent where millions of US citizens become criminals overnight, at the stroke of a pen, for owning something that is extremely common and was completely legal the day before.

They don’t want to go door-to-door demanding they confiscate people’s guns because, number one, thats what fascists do, and number two, that’s how shootouts happen. Can’t say I blame them.

Fine. If you would shoot someone for any reason other than protect the safety of yourself or another from an immediate, identifiable threat, you shouldn’t be allowed to own and carry firearm.

The US media is owned by the same oligarchs who benefit from his fascism. Why would they bite the hand that feeds?

If you would shoot someone over a parking spot, you shouldn’t be able to own a gun.

For the non-US people out there, you should know the shooter will lose his second ammendment rights following this incident. A conviction for any violent crime, even domestic violence, makes it illegal for you to own or possess firearms, and will cause you to fail the background check required for any and all gun purchases (yes, even at gun shows). There’s a grace period where you’re allowed to surrender to the police any guns you can’t legally sell, but after that, it’s illegal to own or possess any firearms for life.

For some reason, I feel like a lot of people, even US citizens, don’t realize this.