• Beacon@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      5 months ago

      The c-suite execs making the payments aren’t anywhere near the poverty line either.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Perhaps none of them should be this far above the poverty line? (Big disclaimer, I didn’t read the article.)

    • Bakkoda@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Did you read the article? It’s obvious what her needs were (see no parenthesis needed), they didn’t meet them so she bowed out. Should she take a deal that’s bad for her because in your mind she doesn’t “need” it?

      That’s why you got downvoted.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      would you take any job offered as long as it’s above the poverty line, or do you have compensation standards based on the job market and your experience?

        • Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          The solution is not to drag everyone down. Teachers deserve to get paid more but their pay comes mostly from local property taxes instead of a trillion dollar company that owns a third of all media.

        • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          This is a relative privation argument. Just because other people are less privileged than Claudia Black doesn’t mean she should be a Disney doormat.