• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Yo if telling yourselves that headline is what it takes to get you dudes out there to vote for the DNC so they can get to ending Citizens United, creating fair elections maps, taxing the rich, and expanding medical coverage: power to you. Let’s go!

  • CromulantCrow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Every time something hopeful like this appears I start wondering if it’s safe to imagine that maybe things could get better here in the US. But so far I’ve been disappointed over and over. Part of me wants to just skip over the “maybe something good will happen” part and get right to the “oh, well, looks like he was assassinated by a blackwater hit squad” part. Money is power. The donor class gets what they want. And I have no faith that working within the electoral system will fix that.

    • berno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Dems are cooked. Nobody is buying the old guard bullshit anymore. Embrace populism or go the way of the Whigs

      • normalexit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Maybe, probably. They are going to gamble that they can stay the same because people are/will be so mad about… well everything.

        They can prop up a white male moderate with an ounce of charisma, someone that is around 45. People will be refreshed that this candidate speaks in complete sentences and the capacity for empathy – like a real person.

        That’s what they want, business as usual sold as a revolutionary idea. Will people buy it? Who knows… groups of people are pretty dumb.

        • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          They are going to gamble that they can stay the same because people are/will be so mad about… well everything.

          They will 100% try to do this, but they’ll end up losing and then blame the voters they’re maligning. Mamdani is a case-in-point difference between status quo candidate turnouts and progressive candidate turnout. The 7% delta over Cuomo is the 7% they’ll lose if they try it again.

    • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Either they listen to their voters and become a ‘new’ democratic party, or they’ll continue bleeding numbers and die. Either way, it’s still the beginning of the end.

  • WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m afraid it’s too late though.

    It’s possible - arguably even likely - that the Dem establishment still won’t get the message and will instead continue to try to con us into supporting corrupt neolib hacks and will continue to undermine actual leftists.

    In fact, I sort of half expect the New York party to abandon Mamdani and instead back a write-in campaign for Cuomo.

    I wish I was kidding.

    Even if they show never-before-seen integrity and determination and actualy shift back toward supporting actual leftists (or get replaced by a new generation of leaders who will), I still think it’s likely going to be too late. The longer Trump and his ilk remain in office, the more likely it becomes that opposing them will just get you on the next flight to some overseas concentration camp, or dead, or both.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The Democrats are going to try to ratfuck him, sure. They’re never going to get the message

      But this is how we clean them out. This is why AOC and Bernie are doing rallies - so that every seat that comes up is filled with a progressive. And this is a big seat

      As for it being too late… Yeah, we’re fucked. But we can still make things better. There’s no reason to yield ground, maga is incredibly incompetent - they can be beat.

      And there will be an after

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if the establishment decides open corruption is pretty cool actually and starts trying to rehabilitate Adams’ image. Seems like trying to run both Adams and Cuomo is a fools errand and Adams is stubborn enough to stay in regardless so they’ll have to go with him.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yeah hope has security detail. I worry ICE going grab him and disappear him. Especially if it looks like he will win the general election.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      It is too late for electoral politics to save democracy, if that’s what you’re talking about. People like Mamdani are important for the day after, but Trump will have to be deposed much like his ilk in Ukraine and Tunisia.

      • arrow74@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        I’m always very intrigued by those pushing the rhetoric that it’s too late to use elections to solve this, and admonish anyone that tries.

        But at the same time they themselves refuse to start a revolution they insist is the only way. While simultaneously waiting for someone else to do it for them.

        In the end the suggestion seems to be to not do anything and hope someone else does it for you. Be that by democratic means or armed means.

        If you’re not starting the rebellion you sure as hell need to be engaged with the existing democratic proccess. Otherwise you’re just not doing anything at all. Which is the worst option

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          22 hours ago

          So first: You do realize there will likely be no free and fair elections until Trump is overthrown right? It’s too late to solve this using elections because there will be no elections. You’re in the equivalent of 1933 Germany after the Enabling Act, where the Act is substituted by the Republican majority in Congress and the lack of consequences for Trump doing whatever he wants.

          Second and more relevantly, though: Revolutions aren’t just “started;” they happen when political unrest reaches a boiling point and is given some kind of trigger. You see the protests in LA? That’s building towards the revolution. A revolution can then turn violent due to violent backlash from the state, but either way it is literally impossible to “start” a revolution in the way you’re talking about. I mean hell, the fall of the Bastille wasn’t exactly planned; it just kind of happened. If a revolution does happen I’d put the start at the current LA protests, but I digress. The point is: To get a revolution, you don’t necessarily need to grab a gun and shoot cops, but you do need to resist on the streets. Again LA is a good example of what I’m talking about, so what I’m calling for is, for starters, more of that in more parts of America. Organize among your community and in your workplace and please someone go on strike already.

          PS: I’m not American, so internet forums are about as much as I can get in on the action.

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Is it possible that not being American your not fully aware of all the cultural views, different groups of people and their views, etc to be making these kind of declarations?

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              16 hours ago

              I don’t think so, no. At the pace democracy is being dismantled at in America, there is simply no possibility of a free and fair midterm. Remember that we’re still not even half a year into this administration.

      • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Maybe in our current state, where corruption can occur, but in a new, more democratic system where corruption can’t occur because no single person will have enough wealth or the financial incentive to be able to buy politicians.

        The problem isn’t electoral politics, but that we don’t live in a democracy.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I was talking more about the whole fascist takeover thing. The current batch of oligarchs and dictators has to go before you can fix anything anywhere, and by the next election cycle American democracy will be dead. The timeline simply doesn’t allow for an electoral solution.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Looks like they already beat you. They want people to give up. You’re willingness to roll over accept defeat doesn’t reflect how the rest of us feel.

  • PixelPilgrim@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ehhh zorhan primary win is more like first big hurtle. Now ZOHRAN has to deal with belligerent part of democratic party and independent runs

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      He already has, up to this point. In fact, big parts of the party tried to support his competition. They failed. He’s another in AOC mould. He may be good or great but there is an increasing trickle of progressive candidates.

      The more that win by being good the more that can win without being so good. He may not be the Dems saviour but he’s a step in the right direction and a worrying sign for Republicans and establishment politicians.

      • PixelPilgrim@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Yeah I’m just saying there’s a lot more to go even in this race alone. Just because ZOHRAN WON the primary that doesn’t mean the Democrats leadership will be happy about it

        • arrow74@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          When I hear that Clinton endorsed a canidate my first thought was, who cares. That guy hasn’t been in office for over 25 years now. Talk about irrelevant

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is NOT true! The ONLY Reason he Won was because we DIDNT have Elon Musk Backing us or make our Platform CLEAR enough! Next time we’ll spend BILLIONS of Dollars LETTING people know we WONT do ANYTHING to Improve Their Lives! THAT will bring them RUSHING back to Us!

    -Chuck Schumer and The DNC!

  • adubya@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    We’ve been waiting for your participation and votes in the Democratic Party. Its great to see people start taking part no matter what brings them on board. If you are excited about this consider joining your local Democratic party, every few years we re-elect everyone from the precinct all the way to the DNC. Check with your State Democratic party for more info.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      You guys can’t even give proper credit and ensure candidates anyone left of “not as fascist as the other party.”

      Eta: and sue to keep third party candidates off the ballots in swing states

      • adubya@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        We need a future where money doesn’t decide politics and appreciate the work to make this an election decided on the issue. Its great day and with a great candidate winning. Having people get involved in their local party can help efforts to better align the party.

        The issue about third party candidates might be a little mute in New York which is one of the last few states that has fusion voting in General elections. Its an intersting effort that allows other parties to nominate a candidate or endorse another parties candidate if they align. Seeing that Zohran Mamdani is a DSA member, its one of the voting methods that helped elect Socialist to office at the turn of the last century. Glad New York retains an intersting voting method and that former Governor Andrew Cuomo didn’t succeed in ruining that legacy.

        Even if you are more interested in DSA it is still worth joining the local party. I believe the DSA support the “Dirty Break” method to build off the Democrat party line and use that as leverage if they or their policies were to be pushed out.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      If your intention is to bring new people into the Democratic party, you’re doing a terrible job. And if it isn’t and you just want to be condescending to straw men online, maybe don’t tie that sort of attitude to the party. You can just be dickish in a personal capacity.