☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
- 1.46K Posts
- 1.01K Comments
2·1 day agoTechnology such as LLMs is just automation and that’s what the base is, how it is applied within a society is what’s dictated by the uperstructure. Open source LLMs such as DeepSeek are a productive force, and a rare instance where a advanced means of production is directly accessible for proletarian appropriation. It’s a classic base level conflict over the relations of production.
3·1 day agoOh I’ve seen the interview with Postol, that was pretty good.
Nah, I don’t think I’m going to take as gospel what a CIA asset say.
Instead, go read Marx to understand the relationship between the technology and the social relations that dictate its use within a society.
Elections are just the surface of the problem. The real issue is who owns the factories and funds the research. In the West that’s largely done by private capital, putting it entirely outside the sphere of public debate. Even universities are heavily reliant on funding from companies now, which obviously influences what their programs focus on.
that’s true yeah
or maybe it’s the capitalist relations and not technology that’s the actual problem here
Russia is definitely sending a message here, I thought it was interesting that abc doesn’t mention it by name though.
And to the Europeans as well, as any war with Europe will immediately result in Europe going dark.
Right, I think the key difference is that we have a feedback loop and we’re able to adjust our internal model dynamically based on it. I expect that embodiment and robotics will be the path towards general intelligence. Once you stick the model in a body and it has to deal with the environment, and learn through experience, then it will start creating a representation of the world based on that.
European politicians are too busy seeing how far their tongues can reach up Trump’s ass to do that.
I would bet money in it happening at this point, and all the European ‘leaders’ pretending like it’s completely normal.
It seemed pretty clear to me. If you have any clue on the subject then you presumably know about the interconnect bottleneck in traditional large models. The data moving between layers often consumes more energy and time than the actual compute operations, and the surface area for data communication explodes as models grow to billions parameters. The mHC paper introduces a new way to link neural pathways by constraining hyper-connections to a low-dimensional manifold.
In a standard transformer architecture, every neuron in layer N potentially connects to every neuron in layer N+1. This is mathematically exhaustive making it comremovedtionally inefficient. Manifold constrained connections operate on the premise that most of this high-dimensional space is noise. DeepSeek basically found a way to reduce networking bandwidth for a model by nearly 70 percent by using manifolds to route communication.
Not really sure what you think the made up nonsense is. 🤷
I’m personally against copyrights as a concept and absolutely don’t care about this aspect, especially when it comes to open models. The way I look at is that the model is unlocking this content and making this knowledge available to humanity.
Ah yes, they must be stealing IP from the future when they publish novel papers on things nobody’s done before!
The EU is not willing to refute Trump’s statement that “the EU needs us to have Greenland and they know that.”
56·7 days agoI do indeed hate living under capitalism
I think you meant to say that Ukraine shows how not to deal with enemy oil processing facilities since they haven’t managed to make any tangible impact on Russia’s oil production https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Russias-Oil-Output-Held-Steady-in-2025.html
for literally everyone except eurofash
don’t threaten me with a good time like that
You might want to learn what words like reactionary actually mean before using them. We are discussing an open source tool, which by its nature lacks the built-in constraints you are describing. Your argument is a piece of sophistry designed to create the illusion of expertise on a subject you clearly do not understand. You are not engaging with the reality of the technology, but with a simplified caricature of it.