Well the guy does know a thing or two about bankrupcy.

Interesting links and context. They have previously been accused of bias for not using the word “terrorist”, so I’m surprised they have even used the word “genocide” at all frankly.

It’s also interesting to read in their wiki controversies section that they have been accused of bias against Israel previously.

I’m on the fence. I’m of the belief that true journalism should be simple reporting on facts, which is what I see. Refusing to condemn a side, or to condemn actions is an odd thing to call bias. Surely declaring anything like that, however righteous it may be, is bias itself.

A smear is normally “hey this guy looks shady and HATES children”, not “we evidence of your sister (the secretary general) on tape routinely accepting kickbacks for government contracts”.

FYI his sister is a government official because Milei specifically removed a law that barred family members from being appointed to such positions.

I see the initial headline is problematic, but I also believe it would have been factual if they’d just put quotation marks around “Hamas camera”, as it is an article reporting on the Israeli quote (at least initially). There are a bunch of other articles on this topic citing other sides and an obituary for the cameraman, so I’m still not convinced Reuters as a whole is compromised.

But, yeah, it’s super weird to completely re-write an article instead of just publishing a new one. And I also don’t know about their history with this type of thing, as you mentioned.

I’m confused by this article as the headline is no longer the same as that screenshot (that statement is at the end of the article) and overall it seems like a factual report which brings the Israeli account into question by simply presenting facts and quotes: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/reuters-ap-journalists-killed-gaza-strike-were-not-a-target-an-israeli-military-2025-08-26/

Mine is stronger because of the luminous epoxy resin I injected in there (pictured).

It’s interesting you act like you read the article, but it clearly states the definition of rape under Swiss law and the criteria that made this judgement fall under that label.

Ah but a bailout package is different. That’s a display of powerful capitalism. A private company so powerful it can’t be allowed to fail and a government so strong it won’t allow it to fail.

Better not help those dying people, they might recover and ask if their whole brown family can stay.

You do realise that Labour were voted in as the progressive alternative on a bunch of pretty progressive campaign pledges right? The Online Safety Act and treating peaceful protesters as terrorists certainly weren’t what people voted for.

Interesting, I was doubting your Al Jazeera assertion, but it’s true. They literally haven’t posted one article about him, when he has been in the news for years.

So same maximum sentence as the guy who threw a subway sandwich at an ICE agent? Would you then only get a one year sentence if you instead drove into a group of ICE agents? Hmmm.

I would like to propose you eat my gas

You’re not going to catch me out with this one again!

You might as well just say you don’t want people to be educated at all with a statement like that.

“Israeli Settler” who is plainly on the video shooting at a crowd, named, internationally sanctioned and fully identified. But let’s just call him “Israeli settler” for the headline…

Is this like a “how many clowns can we fit in the car” question?

If we are using the hammer analogy, let’s assume the user isn’t an expert with hammers already and is just trying to hammer in a nail to secure something to a wall. They start hammering and the nail bends and looks terrible and isn’t secure at all, but the hammer pipes up “don’t worry that’s, exactly what it should look like. Just hammer it again even harder to make sure”.

Everyone is like “oh look they made ChatGPT say something stupid, what a stupid article and writer”. Not, “ChatGPT will say stupid stuff as fact, what a stupid and underdeveloped tool”.

I think the headline would be “Illegal, Non-Safety Tested Car Disables Driver in Crash”