I am very curious to see how US, the fascist dog of Israel will react to that. More taxes?

Don’t worry. US will block any try to make them accountable.

Taking in consideration the position of the majority of Jewish leaders for the past 5 decades can be considered offensive to say.

You misspelled “dog”.

Durable peace in the middle east is not possible while the state of Israel exists.

Sorry. I didn’t mean to direct to an specific president. It applies to any US president. Trump is a bit more aggressive, but he is like this about anything.

Monsters. And while the have their dog in the white house, nothing will happen to them.

I think this is not exactly the point. I never thought that license would fight rocket. Nor I thought that an authoritarian regime would respect license.

The first point affects more countries and companies that still keep ties with those regimes.

The second point is to have a clear position. For me it is hypocritical to say “open source for a better world” at the same time that we say “how my contributions are used is not my problem”.

I bet with you that commo libraries like slf4j, junit, poetry, fastapi, etc. are being used by those regimes and their associates very often. Make a license more restrictive would create legal problems for any legitimate foreign entity to buy from those regimes. If they opt to re-inplement those libraries, it’s fine as well: tons of resources and money expended by those jerks.

Even commercial licenses are problematic to enforce, I know. But send a clear message seems a point where our hands can reach and worth to pursue.