

Not ‘no shit’, the USSR had a ‘No first use’ policy. As does modern China, as does modern India.
Not ‘no shit’, the USSR had a ‘No first use’ policy. As does modern China, as does modern India.
Unalive started being widely used 2020-2021.
Does anyone have a complete list? The article says there’s a package manager and video/TV streaming app and this chat app. What about money transfers and banking? Does this Max app do email?
Are you implying YouTube sponsors equipment and office space for new accounts?
Depending on the phone probably, but it takes a long time for the phone to turn on. Taking it out of the bag and waiting for a network connection by comparison isn’t as bad.
Nah, Zelensky hasn’t denied something Trump requested of him, he’s carrying out the plan. The USA wants out optically, but they want the war to continue, with EU nations managing it. They couldn’t be happier with him.
Why is this petition hosted on the USA government site Change.org for USA citizens instead of ECI where there are legal requirements for the EU to take action on petitions?
Do libs admit the USA is involved yet? Because otherwise what does the opinion and actions of a USA politician have any influence at all.
The strike killed seven and maimed eight. All but Anas al-Sharif were collateral damage. The justification for the strike was killing al-Sharif, who Israel says was secretly hiding Hamas soldiers in his backpack.
Al Jazeera reporter.
Very good
Sounds good, and if you don’t own the autos personally then the space needed to store them can also be partially mitigated. But it’s so so so much more environmentally damaging (which directly translates into money, as it’s more materials, more labour, more transport, more machines, etc) than a train where the equivalent of one auto can pull several cheap cars with a ton of people. And it’s so much more complicated to get right, you don’t have a successful model to copy from. It’s not that it’s a bad idea, it’s that trains and buses are a much better idea.
The internet already asks for ID for everything. Cloudflare or phone verification, or an account from a service that requires one of those two. As much as possible, I don’t use things on the internet.
I support censorship on Lemmy.ml and my home instance Lemmygrad. You need censorship to have a chance of having good interactions, otherwise it’ll just be deliberate attacks, shock-content drowning out anything you’d wish to engage with.
But the software isn’t censored. If you don’t like the censorship regime in your particular instance, you can go to a different instance. Almost none will be zero-censorship, but you can find one that is permissive. If you insist on no censorship at all, hosting your own on your home computer is feasible.
For any liberals stumbling through: Sanctions are violence. This is the USA subjecting people pursuing peaceful means to violence. The response is the same if you oppose them peacefully and ineffectively or through counter-violence.
You can write fuck China on Lemmy.ml if it’s relevant and motivated. The difference is that it’s always obvious why the USA and Israel should be condemned. I think China’s Israel stance is super weak, and I doubt I’d get mod pushback for saying that in an article about how China keeps selling genocide-equipment to Israel during a genocide. Or about how China is pushing for a two-state solution instead of saying Israel is illegitimate and should be dismantled.
If you go “Fuck Cameroon” on an unrelated post, for example this one, a mod would rightly tell you to be civil or at least explain yourself. And if you then justify yourself on a basis of white supremacy or conspiracy theories as you are bound to do, then that reasoning will be rejected.
Pretending like the EU is working for the interests of EU members: What exactly is the argument for giving them 500 milliard euro in aid, and agreeing to buy their inferior products for super critical uses? How big were the tariffs they were threatening without those outrageous gifts? How can von der Leyen and co. expect us to believe they could go any higher and still afford to buy any European products?
China is selling higher quality energy equipment for a fraction of the price, and Russia is selling competitive military equipment for a fraction of the price. Not to mention the inherit security risk of buying foreign military equipment to begin with.
If the product is 15% more expensive, it might push it over the threshold where it’s no longer the most competitive product, and a competitor gets the sale instead.
The source is EuroMed Monitor, it’s a link. It’s also repeated in the text of the post. This is the article covering the same topic posted to the official website. https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/6795/Starving-civilians-in-northern-Gaza-lured-to-aid-sites-and-executed,-revealing-brutal-pattern-of-Israel’s-genocide
They have the same enemies. They literally have the same nukes and missile silos. If the USSR could do it, if China can do it, then Russia with the world’s strongest conventional military, can also do it. Of course two countries can be compared, and Russia and the USSR are more apt to compare than any other country.