cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/34367979

More barriers to cycling means more cars which means more dead cyclists. Help us defeat this terrible anti-safety bill.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Okay - require kids to have a safety certificate. How do you enforce that? E-bikes aren’t big, motorized vehicles that have to be registered like snowmobiles. They look like any other bike for the most part.

    Cops can’t just pull over everyone who looks like they might be a kid because they might be on an e-bike and that e-bike might be a class-3 that might be self-powering while pedaled over 28mph or have a motor over 700 watts and the possible teenage might not have taken a safety certificate.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I don’t think that your cops should be focused on proactively enforcing this kind of stuff at all, as you seem to agree it’s a fools errand that sort of begs for problematic interactions. The energy should be going toward making safety culture and education ubiquitous. If you look at crash and injury stats for your jurisdiction by vehicle type it should be readily obvious where any or all of your proactive enforcement efforts should be directed. State laws about electric bike / electric motorcycles are messy because they’re pushing through a car culture, on car infrastructure, against car lobbies and so I can understand why the kneejerk response is to frustratingly try and integrate all of these fiddly classifications into enforcement directives, but I think that’s a misdirection. If it looks like a bike, focus on education. Don’t be having your squad cars pull over bicycles, motor or otherwise, that’s just absurd. Maybe in the future some of these classification will just be considered motorcycles, and that will be much cleaner. But the mess in the meantime is mostly artificial.