Despite decades of evidence on the toxic effects of lead battery recycling, companies opted not to act and blocked efforts to clean up the industry.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 days ago

    For what it’s worth, it’s not anti anything to point out flaws. If anything, it’s being pro because it opens the door for a conversation; which, if both sides come at it in good faith, can lead to change.

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think that my ratio makes your point, lol. I neglected to note that we need to do better, instead of just leaving it open ended.

      My understanding of the current process is that it’s quite wasteful/under development. With the state of things as they are it seems unlikely that the automakers are going to improve things over the recycling that they encouraged with lead acid. But one can hope, and lobby for change.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, I’m not sure why you’re being downvoted. Everything you said is true, and respectful.

        I think open-ended can be okay, so long as there are milestones we can achieve (i.e. try different things out to see what works and what doesn’t). Something as big as the environment, health/safety, and not completely alienating industries (as much as I hate to say it, we do need them and their resources to an extent), is not something that is going to be easily solved without compromise.

        I expect that my last two points will not win me any popularity contests, but they cannot be ignored.

    • NChiwana76@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I like it, but it’s contingent on Americans actually wanting to solve the issue instead of one upping each other.