TheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoBig Surprise—Nobody Wants 8K TVswww.howtogeek.comexternal-linkmessage-square375linkfedilinkarrow-up1561
arrow-up1561external-linkBig Surprise—Nobody Wants 8K TVswww.howtogeek.comTheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square375linkfedilink
minus-squareGeometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·1 year agoYep, just imagine how bad the compression artefacts will be if they double the resolution but keep storage/network costs the same.
minus-squareTyphoon@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·1 year agoDoubling the dimensions make it 4x the data.
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoThat’s not true for compressed video. It doubles the bitrate for the same quality on modern codecs (265, av1, etc.)
minus-squareAnivia@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 year agoIncreasing resolution but keeping the same bitrate still improves the image quality, unless the bitrate was extremely low in the first place. Especially with modern codecs 20mbps 4k looks a lot better than 20mbps 1080p with AV1
Yep, just imagine how bad the compression artefacts will be if they double the resolution but keep storage/network costs the same.
Doubling the dimensions make it 4x the data.
That’s not true for compressed video. It doubles the bitrate for the same quality on modern codecs (265, av1, etc.)
deleted by creator
Increasing resolution but keeping the same bitrate still improves the image quality, unless the bitrate was extremely low in the first place. Especially with modern codecs
20mbps 4k looks a lot better than 20mbps 1080p with AV1