Anyone know if this is true or not?

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I mean, I kind of guessed this way back when Collective Shout pushed their action.

    I actually had a comment removed here on Lemmy when I brought up how this was “US politics/elections affecting your life as gamers”, because the mods insisted it was purely an Australian action, and my comment was off-topic. But we live in a global online world. There’s no way that US politics wouldn’t have a huge effect on this type of censorship.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      There’s no way that US politics wouldn’t have a huge effect on this type of censorship.

      I’ve been called a fearmonger also for trying to tell apathetic gamers who “hate politics” that if they don’t get involved they’re going to start losing their own goddamn games.

      I have linked the “Conservapedia” articles on video games all over reddit until they banned me. I have tried to tell people that voting for Trump or supporting his ideals even distantly isn’t going to “take the woke out of your games” that it will actually crush your gaming entirely, because… and I can’t stress this enough, Conservatives HATE GAMING. Not the online chuds and 4channers who hate women, they’re barely even conservatives… they’re fodder for the online fights. But the old-guard and middle-class conservatives who get marching orders from churches and grifters, the ones who have all the actual money on the right. They want to see an end to “distractions” and fiction and fantasy and everything that isn’t some kind of sanitized, un-nuanced devotion to Dear Leader and his United States of White Jesus.

      Fiction has been an enemy of power since writing began, and games are just another kind of fiction that lets people stretch their imagination. This is why it’s dangerous, this is why they want to see it ended.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Fiction has been an enemy of power since writing began

        x for doubt

        Since there are downvotes, what are the earliest fictional texts and what did they do in regard of power?

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Gilgamesh literally becomes king. He changes the power paradigm to put himself on top and thats the oldest text we have.

          • plyth@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            What came first, kings or the stories about kings?

            I think kings came first, and the story supported their power.

              • plyth@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Even if, why shouldn’t something doubtful be pointed out?

                But in this discussion it’s relevant. That White Jesus, do we believe that it is facts? Power is using fiction to create a following first. Then those followers prevent an opposition from forming.

                Now why are stories about sex told? There seem to be many reasons but one could be to encourage people to have sex. So the opposition tries to make people experience reality with other people while Conservatives try to keep them in their fictional, isolated world.

                In other words, fiction is not only an enemy but also a friend of power.