Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-24 months agoHigh-speed rail construction since 2008lemmy.worldimagemessage-square79linkfedilinkarrow-up1540cross-posted to: dataisbeautiful@lemmy.world
arrow-up1540imageHigh-speed rail construction since 2008lemmy.worldDavriellelouna@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-24 months agomessage-square79linkfedilinkcross-posted to: dataisbeautiful@lemmy.world
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·edit-24 months ago If a train line is not profitable, its not used Peak car/capitalist brain. You gonna hold roads to the same standard?
minus-squaretheUwUhugger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-24 months ago1 Yes, I would hold high roads as they are comperatively a more expensive investment meant for a larger volume of transportation. 2 China is state capitalist, but for its dictatorial nature there is no accountability so there is no after effect of such a colossal fuckup
minus-squarecrunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·4 months agoAny investment or possible “profit” is lost as soon as a road needs repairs. And high-use roads need repairs waaaaay more often and are a lot more expensive than maintaining a rail system.
minus-squaretheUwUhugger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoWill not repeat myself, please read the comment you commented under
Peak car/capitalist brain. You gonna hold roads to the same standard?
1 Yes, I would hold high roads as they are comperatively a more expensive investment meant for a larger volume of transportation.
2 China is state capitalist, but for its dictatorial nature there is no accountability so there is no after effect of such a colossal fuckup
Any investment or possible “profit” is lost as soon as a road needs repairs. And high-use roads need repairs waaaaay more often and are a lot more expensive than maintaining a rail system.
Will not repeat myself, please read the comment you commented under