it makes you hope that stephens is a shill since actually believing this makes him a monster and i wish i could say that the nyt was monstrous for having him in staff, but they’ve already proved that beyond a shadow of a doubt and the nyt’s reremovedtion seems as invulnerable as the oligarchy.
nyt’s reremovedtion seems as invulnerable as the oligarchy.
Ok look, the NYT is based out of New York City which has property owned by rich people all over the earth, you have to understand that gives the New York Times an air of mystique to liberals that their atrophied nervous system identifies as cultural power and relevance. It is like catnip for ideologically vapid centrists.
it makes you hope that stephens is a shill since actually believing this makes him a monster and i wish i could say that the nyt was monstrous for having him in staff, but they’ve already proved that beyond a shadow of a doubt and the nyt’s reremovedtion seems as invulnerable as the oligarchy.
Ok look, the NYT is based out of New York City which has property owned by rich people all over the earth, you have to understand that gives the New York Times an air of mystique to liberals that their atrophied nervous system identifies as cultural power and relevance. It is like catnip for ideologically vapid centrists.
Isn’t this redundant? Lol