• stephen01king@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        An extreme counterexample is required in response to your extreme mischaracterization of the guy’s argument. I’m just continuing down your logic of exaggerating the argument to the point of being nonsensical. It turns out you only like it when you do it to other people, but not when its done to you.

        • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          my point is that a society optimise for an individual ends up being needlessly wasteful and miserable for an individual.

          a society were time is so scarse that is in your best interest to have someone barely making a living so you can have overpriced cold meals, because having time to just exist and do groceries and cook is unfeasible.

          however a more collectivist and less atomised society you would rarely be in such situation in the first place

          • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            You’re right, but that’s wanting something that the guy you’re replying to is powerless to change by himself. Simply arguing against using gig economy delivery services without fixing the underlying cause for why they need to use it doesn’t solve the problem.

            • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              he can change it, we all can,

              participate in your community, find local mutual aids…

              it’ll make you feel much better, less powerless, and make their neighbourhood a much better place to be.