• IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Basically when a piece of art is radical, expect a radical response. So being “shocked” is silly to me. That’s all.

    • Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 days ago

      There are plenty of shows where people appear nude, so what makes GoT “radical”? And why would it being radical justify people demanding to see the actors nude?

      • IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        I never said it justifies it, I just said it is expected because that’s how people are. So being shocked about it is ridiculous to me. It’s bad, but don’t be “shocked” after being a part of a piece of radical art.

        • Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Ok however you want to phrase it you’re still dancing around the meaning of radical and how it creates this expectation.

          • IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 days ago

            In this case the meaning of radical is the presentation of intense nudity usually in the form of incest. I hope that cleared it up.

            • Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              Not remotely - for starters there isn’t intense nudity, especially not compared to plenty of others shows, but even if it was and that made it radical, why does some nudity mean people will expect nudity from everyone?