• MimicJar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    17 hours ago

    There are specific carve outs listed in the law to exempt ads for movies, television shows, streaming content, video games and other works that feature synthetic performers in the entire work.

    That seems like a pretty big carve out.

    • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’d assume it’s for things like (e.g. Pixar) films, or stuff like GTA6 where there obviously isn’t any actual people in the end result but hoping they’ve actually spelled out that constraint in the law.

      • MimicJar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That’s my hope too. Basically you can’t pretend to use real people if someone would reasonably think they are real people.

        But I hope they’ve worded it well.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I was wondering about that.

      So basically it’s for deepfakes and otherwise worthless. That’s disappointing.

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        I agree - ads that depict dentists, firefighters, etc to sell things should use real dentists, firefighters, etc. not actors pretending.

          • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            I know. I just think it’s disingenuous to disapprove of fakery using AI but approve of fakery people do on their own. To me it’s like saying you’re evil if you use a ladder instead of asking a tall person to reach things for you.