

you’re seriously bad at reading
you’re seriously bad at reading
my only opinion here was maybe don’t lose your shit over a simple word. I think it’s pretty solid.
your comment doesn’t follow but at least it’s more hinged. have a nice weekend.
again, i know nothing about the person, I’m just responding to you. so far your entire tirade seems to be based on the word probably.
are you basing this on other comments by the same person? because I saw none of that in the comment you cited and this is starting to sound like either projection or some sort of trauma-led bad faith interpretation to be generous.
also fuck off with that legwork bullshit I’m just replying to your unhinged comments don’t pretend like I’m putting in any effort here.
“they knew some things and didn’t know some things” isn’t worth getting so worked up over. they knew the mere concept of sex being taboo negatively affected them and didn’t want to make definitive statements about things they didn’t research. believe it or not lemmy comments are not dissertations and most people just talk and don’t bother researching every tangential topic just to make a point they want to make.
none of this applies to the comment they cited as an example of defending pedophilia.
they will never go “huh”. you give way too much credit to corporate management.
I don’t know, just sounds like I’d be contributing to the marketers metrics so they can show “it works”. it’ll only make them invest in ads more. if anyone thinks capitalists are these genius level manipulators who know how everything works I only refer to the richest person alive being the least charismatic, least knowledgable, unfuckable troglodyte who keeps making an ass of himself.
if any of these companies suffer any losses or reduced profits they’ll just fire hardworking people, not one of them will turn around and say maybe the ads aren’t working when you actively work to show them that it is working.
I’m sorry but classifying that as advocating for pedophilia is crazy. all they said is they don’t know about studies regarding it so they said “probably” instead of making a definitive statement. you took that word and ran with it; your response is extremely over the top and hostile to someone who didn’t advocate for what you’re saying they advocate for.
It’s none of my business what you do with your time here but if I were you I’d be more cool headed about this because this is giving qanon.
what he fuck I’ve never ran into anyone like that.don’t even wanna know where you do this regularly
mostly people with jobs
so first there was no gatekeeping but now gatekeeping is good, actually. brilliant
the post is literally about gatekeeping what the fuck are you even taking about
gatekeeping always helps with conversion rates, keep it up 👍
it’s not, and that is probably the case. still good to see because I’m sure it annoys him as the most insecure bitch baby in the world.
because it’s an llm there’s zero credence to what it says but I like that grok’s takes on elon are always almost exclusively dunking on him. this is like the 40th thing I see about grok talking about elon and it always talks shit about him
cease your attempts at causing “retrieve” to transpire.
with all the transactions all around the world can you imagine the money they’re making by doing literally nothing and if this move is successful how much money they stand to lose? I would be surprised if they were not literally talking to hitmen right now.