“People are arseholes. They’re just always gonna be that way.”

#norobot #noindex #NoAI

  • 16 Posts
  • 98 Comments
Joined 27 days ago
cake
Cake day: July 23rd, 2026

help-circle











  • gonna be a shitshow

    Pure doomerism.

    The schools where I grew up had one landline for over a thousand kids. The sole school secretary answered it as well as handling other duties. It had a call-waiting system. If there was an issue that might prompt lots of parents to call in, they’d just update the OGM: “If you’re calling about the such-and-such, here’s the latest information. Blah blah. Otherwise, please hold to speak to someone.” It was always fine.

    As for checking-in to class, no need to use smartphones: teachers can take the register (roll-call) at the start of each class.






  • spoken like someone who has copyleft all of my work… fuck copyright laws

    You seem to be confusing copyleft with public domain.

    They are not the same.

    Copyleft licenses entirely rely on copyright law. In the words of the people who invented copyleft:

    Copyleft is a way of using the copyright on the program. It doesn’t mean abandoning the copyright; in fact, doing so would make copyleft impossible. The “left” in “copyleft” is not a reference to the verb “to leave”—only to the direction which is the mirror image of “right.”

    Public domain, OTOH, which is what you seem to be promoting, is a gift to AI tech bros, who want to behave as the middlemen described in the same article:

    [IP] in the public domain, uncopyrighted … allows people to share [it], if they are so minded. But it also allows uncooperative people to convert [it] into proprietary [IP]. They can make changes, many or few, and distribute the result as a proprietary product. People who receive the [latter] do not have the freedom that the original author gave them; the middleman has stripped it away.



  • Spoken like a plagiarism-happy AI tech bro, repackaging other people’s effort for profit.

    In the context of IP, “theft” is an idiomatic way to say “infringement”. It’s bizarre of you to suggest it doesn’t exist: infringement law is quite well settled in most parts of the world.

    IP doesn’t refer to “ideas”. It refers to creative works. If you’ve ever spent effortful hours/weeks/years:

    • composing music
    • recording music
    • writing a novel, textbook, poem, teaching plan, essay, or a scientific paper
    • painting a portrait
    • etc

    then you’ll know why the difference between “an idea” and a creative work is sometimes called “sweat of the brow”.


  • It’s run by Bambu Labs, a Chinese state-subsidised company that’s notorious for nudging users globally to let Internet-connected 3D printers map their home LANs and upload that info, plus name, address & other billing details, plus all their 3D models, to Chinese “cloud” servers where the CCP can siphon off any models useful for advancing Chinese industry.

    They’re also notorious for letting Makerworld users rip off each others’ designs in flagrant violation of the design licenses. Look on Reddit or 3D printing forums and you’ll see tons of people complaining about this.

    Bambu Labs also recently egregiously violated the AGPL by threatening a lawsuit against Pavel Jarczak, a hobbyist who found a perfectly legal workaround to reduce BL control over people’s printers. This was a big deal: the Software Freedom Conservancy, Louis Rossmann, and Gamers Nexus all pledged action.

    Bambu Labs and Makerworld stand for dictatorship, authoritarianism, and kleptocracy.

    If you support FOSS, user rights, and democracy, you really ought to boycott them.

    https://sfconservancy.org/news/2026/may/18/bambu-studio-3d-printer-agpl-violation-response/

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLLVn6XT7v0