

“I would have an issue” that IS what’s happening. Far right parties’ modus operandi IS constantly lying, much much more than left wing ones, pretty much everywhere. So you have an issue with them correct?
“I would have an issue” that IS what’s happening. Far right parties’ modus operandi IS constantly lying, much much more than left wing ones, pretty much everywhere. So you have an issue with them correct?
Yes. Would you allow a company to sell actual poison that is marketed as a health food? What if a study showed 50.1% of all people believed it was not actually poisonous because of a successful marketing campaign by the company? What if innocent babies and children were ingesting this poison because their parents believed it was safe?
What if all those people believed companies shouldn’t be allowed to sell poison. But that this company should be allowed to sell their product because they mistakenly believe it’s not poison.
If you agree with banning a child killing poison but not with banning a far right party, please explain how it’s fundamentally any different.
It’s much harder to be abused when you ban the only party abusing it.
Upvoted for honesty lol.
Somehow I doubt allowing it actually meaningfully helps the situation. It sounds like an alcoholic arguing that a glass of wine actually helps them not drink.
You want to brag about civil rights? Here in America some guy filibustered for a long time. Well it wasn’t a filibuster, more of a really long speech. But he really showed the fascists he could talk for a really long time. Take that France.
Let’s just make it 0 already, get it over with.
I’m wondering how that stacks up to human drivers. Since the data is redacted I’m guessing not well at all.
If they planned a 1 month migration of a small component, 6 months to complete would be pretty lucky imo. Refactoring Legacy Code mentions the 2.0 approach they’re taking. Spoiler alert, it doesn’t work…
You could mass edit your comment history to be the same comment you got banned for. That’s what I did to cope 🖕I got banned from 5 more subreddits over it, looking at the b.s. excuses brought me some closure. The comment was “Musk’s fumes are fatally toxic”. Instaban.
Mass edit your comments while you still can. I got halfway through my history before being blocked.
Welcome friend!!
You can’t just cite established law without thinking about what Musk/Trump think. What do you think this is, a democracy?
I did. I got banned for “Musk fuming is fatally toxic”. The platform is dead now. I bet he has good dirt on Huffman.
Yep it’s literally half of the results. I’m astounded that this is legal. Well not that astounded.
I’m not racist. I’m just really into 1940’s German artillery. For the engineering, you know. /s
Brave search allows misinformation goggles for anyone that believes 2 + 2 = 5.
What other reason would tech billionaires and CEOs care to spy on you? They bought everything else, they have a privacy fetish obviously.
And the engineers who work there too.