They never give up. After a bill attempt is buried, a new one is prepared just weeks afterwards.

Thanks! I had exactly zero knowledge of any of those communities. I’ve just subscribed to all of them.

Thanks a lot! Just like before, I have these two questions:

-Do I need a pair? Or only one can be enough connected to the router, and then I can connect normal wifi clients (phones, laptops, an AP maybe) on the smaller shed?

-Can these be managed completely offline?

Thanks a lot! Would I need two of these devices? Or just the directional antenna hooked to the home router, then just any spare router to act as AP on the receiving shed?

EDIT: Additional question -> It seems to mention some cloud controller-options. Can these be managed completely locally via some local webUI?

I’m not too concerned about the TP-Link advisory in this case, as it wouldn’t be hooked to the internet directly (still needs to go through a non-TP-Link router), and this is in a rather sparse location far away.

Thank you for the information! Since Proxmox does this by itself with those templates it uses, I never did this process. I guess I’ll check some guide…thanks a lot!

Yup! I got that far. But when I try to create a new VM/container using LXC instead, I’m prompted for an URI. i have no idea what I’m supposed to enter there. In Proxmox it just downloads the templates itself from its own repository, but i have no idea what I’m supposed to input here. I didn’t find any guide about this :(

Thanks…The first one might actually be a normal GUI. However I don’t see a way to compile it for non-debian (I’m running Nobara, which is Fedora-based). The second one is definitely a webUI.

Yeah…So far I managed to connect virt-manager to the LXC daemon after a few attempts, but I’m a bit stuck now. In order to create a new LXC container it asks for an URI and I don’t know which one should I put.

Thanks…That’s my fault. I guess I wanted to mention I was looking for a GUI-like way of doing it. Same way virt-manager does. It handles libvirt in the background, but I guess a nice more intuitive manner of following a process to create a VM. I wanted to see if I can do something similar for a container.

Thanks! I was hoping it would have its own GUI, not having to run from a webUI…Kinda makes integration with a virtual desktop a bit easier. I’d like to have the equivalent of a virtualbox VM, with desktop etc, but running on a container.

Hmmm I might be open to try. But my idea would be to have the equivalent of a local full blown VM running with its own desktop environment. But on a container. I can do this in proxmox, but I’d like to replicate it locally on my laptop.

I’m all for options, to be honest. What ideally I’d like is some sort of good encrypted email based in some safe European country, which can achieve decent Android integration. Proton apps are pretty useless to that effect (lack of offline basic functionalities, the calendar app isn’t even an android calendar provider). I’m not too hard in moving around my emails, since for the last few years I’ve been giving my email @duck.com which actually ends up sending to my final email after some tracking cleaning. Changing email provider would entail only updating my @duck.com destination.

Following up…Yeah, why not Startmail or Disroot? Startmail seems to offer more bang for the buck than Mailbox. I’m not sure how many aliases you get if you get a paid plan in disroot.

EDIT: I…misread. Startmail offers half-priced plan the first year, then goes ahead and doubles it, getting pricier than Proton, Mailbox and about everyone else I think.

Can we have the names in the headlines of which MPs keeps consistently putting this crap on the agenda multiple times every year for the last couple of decades?