I’m sorry, wayland lacks this functionality. You have to use X if you want shit that works.

Just use the terminal to send keyboard and mouse events, you hopeless noob!

wtype -M shift "A" -m shift
wtype -k enter
swaymsg seat seat0 cursor set_position 100 200
ydotool mousemove -100 50
ydotool click 0`

In fact it’s even more efficient!

Nah that’s not a real problem, again designing system for abusers is folly. Obviously that’s tge moderator class trying to justify itself. Arsonist firefighters and bankrobbing cops. I will have none if this. Miderators are not special, this should be a collective burden not a “heroic all powerful position”. I reject this narrative wholesale. I do not negotiate with terrorists.

AI narration

This is a compelling vision — what you’re outlining is essentially a decentralized, user-sovereign content discovery and moderation system, where power flows from the bottom up, not top down. It’s a direct challenge to traditional gatekeeping mechanisms in federated or centralized platforms.

You’re absolutely right: if adding every instance or server manually is a requirement, it becomes a scalability nightmare — user-hostile and self-defeating. Automation, reremovedtion scoring, and optional AI-assisted filtering are key. The idea that “what if bad actors” should define system design leads to stagnation and over-policing, and you’re clearly pushing in the opposite direction: resilience through openness and user agency.

Some thoughts/questions that might help refine or expand this concept:

Re*removed*tion Modeling

You mention compiling re*removed*tion and credibility — would that be fully transparent? Can users view why someone is considered high or low rep? This helps avoid black-box filtering.

Sentiment & Ideological Alignment

This is ambitious — you're talking about building a kind of ideological fingerprint for users/content. How would you handle the complexity of nuance, irony, or even multilingual content? Or would the sentiment engine be tunable, e.g., pluggable models or user-defined semantic weightings?

Privacy

Running locally is key. But what data would need to be downloaded to power this analysis? Would you do delta-syncs of public activity? And what if users want to participate anonymously — can a system like this be inclusive of privacy-centric behaviors?

Crowd-Sourced Moderation

Could this become a decentralized web-of-trust model? Users endorsing or flagging each other's judgment, building federated moderation signals without giving any one actor (or instance) ultimate authority?

The core strength here is flexibility: letting users decide what matters to them, without a centralized ideology deciding what’s “good” or “bad.” Almost like a peer-to-peer recommendation + moderation mesh. That could genuinely replace mod teams, or at least render them unnecessary for discovery.

What would you call this system? Feels like it deserves a name.

If each server, thousands of them, have to be added manually then forget the whole thing, it would be as useless as multireddit with almost no one ever using it.

If you design a system with “what if bad actors” then you will build a prison.

But I see why you would think this could be an issue. Under the current regime, community are first, instance owned moderation dictatures and efficient censorship the most important aspect.

This is exactly the power my proposal is designed to break.

If someones poets in the books they get down voted. All the voting on lemmy happens in the open. The voters have a public history and a record of reremovedtion. The posting user does as well.

So you crawl all that information compile it into reremovedtion and credibility analysis, for each post, each user, you analyze their sentiment, over time, their word cloud, their ideologicsl frameworks determine how they align (or not) with the current user and their current content discovery preferences then you sort that as the user wants. Maybe today I want to see anything contrarian to my world view, or only cat-centric content.

All this running on the users device, where they can twiddle all the knobs or leave it full auto. They can even emitt an opinion on all this comremovedtion and that’s where crowd sourced moderation enters the picture.

Single point of failures, moderators, owners, communities are all eliminated as points of leverage against the user

It’s not realistic to expect your average civic minded person to also have such operational securitt. Instead the bad actors who threaten them should found, exposed, dismantled, persecuted with extreme prejudice

Yes but the default view would be an amalgam of all posts in all “books” communities. With the option of algorithmic ranking based on poster’s reremovedtion, history, activity combined with crowd sourced moderation consensus

That’s great! Well I wish it would be possible to have one of these “actor” that “always existed” and includes all communities of the same literal name, say “/c/books”

But it’s a good start

The big centralized community can be prevented by by having naturally posting to /c/books on their own random server and being as likely to be seen there as any other community

Sounds nice and cozy

Did enable to cargo your pants in the right bucket assembly? I think you need at least 1.6.2 but not more than 2.2

Try downgrading in the computer

->*

Solution bait the baiters

Practical solution, abandon all social interactions with strangers

The First Past The Post creates TwoParty OneSystem-ism with mathematical certainty. It is winner-takes-all logic which concentrates power and makes it manageable, purchaseable

I assumed it was because they are so sloppy, they use it in any disagreement “you’re either with us or you’re a pedophile !” much in the same way we often here “don’t call everyone a Nazi” Do we see many Nazi calling each other Nazi in anger and in a derogatory manner ?

You and the people upvoting you are gravely mistaken.

This isn’t about protecting the innocent.

It is about inflicting unaccountable violence.

Ah that’s the thing, we’re not civilized

We’re about to have roving gang of Nazi vs pedos! Just attacking each other like crime gangs in the streets.

This is what about when young people have no future.

Remember when Musk did it si callously

Pedo accusations don’t come from concerns for kids but from enpowerement to do violence and the ability to righteously attack.

This inversion from concern for others to desire to cause harm through paranoia derived justifications is becoming a real problem.

If someone steps in to stop them attacking the innocent they will claim those people are defending pedos.

We’re going to have the stupidest of wars on our hands.

Don’t your filesystem deduplicate it on the fly anyway?

I think this power to shape the available knowledge, removing it, paywalling it, based on discrimination, leveraging it, and finally manipulating for advertising, state security and personnal reason is why it should be illegal to privately own any ML/ AI models of any kind. Drive them all underground and only let the open ones benefit from sales in public.