well because these chatbots are designed to be really affirming and supportive and I assume people with such problems really love this kind of interaction compared to real people confronting their ideas critically.

at least give it some shape that is not an eye sore to start with

Russia has been using LLM based social media bots for quite a while now

extreme right: if you don’t think like us we will deport you

everyone else: you are extreme right

extreme right: OMG I AM BEING OPRESSED HEEELP

“then he accidentally posted them online under his war thunder account” would be a continuation that surprises none of us

the world needs to urgently integrate

• critical thinking
• media interpretation
• AI fundamentals
• applied statistics

courses into every school’s ciriculum starting from the age of ten to graduation, repeated yearly. Otherwise we are fucked.

“what do you mean we can’t use fake misleading videos to fuck democracy?”

so putting batteries in the fridge wasn’t useful after all, we should put them in the oven

is this what cancer looks like on society scale? a right wing organization destroying any attempt at equity so that billionaires can suck up even more of the world’s resources until the point of no return

make him eat all of that chicken

“We will have AI agents that run the network with no manual intervention.”

Sounds hard to believe.

billionaires are a systematic risk to the tech industry.

FFY

Oh shit had already forgotten about this amid so many other scandals. The guy who said this is running the whole of US like a fucking medieval kingdom, another reality slap in the face. At that time I was like, “surely no one right in the mind would vote for this scammer”.

I unfortunately don’t can someone explain?

NOOOOOO ITS DOING NUCLEAR PHYSICS!!!111

good point I try to initialize None collections to empty collections in the beginning but not always guaranteed and len would catch it

this screenshot looks more like the beginning of something else. I wonder where they trained their AI model on hmm…

no conflict of interest, none at all

It is not “assume” as in a conscious “this is probably a bool I will assume so” but more like a slip of attention by someone who is more used to the bool context of not. Is “not integer” or “not list” really that commonly used that it is even comparable to its usage in bool context?

If there is an alternative through which I can achieve the same intended effect and is a bit more safer (because it will verify that it has len implemented) I would prefer that to commenting. Also if I have to comment every len use of not that sounds quite redundant as len checks are very common