tl;dr:
You have zero proof and are just wildly speculating to make up a story that fits your preferred narrative. As I already said: There is no reason to even consider this bs unless you come with a proof, which - to no surprise - you are unwilling to do.
We are not talking about the f-ing USA. We are talking about France.
Do you have any prove the trial was unfair? Any? No? Ok. Case closed!
The case of Le Pen still raises thorny questions for democracies: Should the rule of law apply always, or only most of the time? And when it comes to politicians, how can we trust the law is being applied without political considerations?
What a pile of BS.
There was a proper court that convicted her according to the applicable laws. Do we raise thorny questions if anyone else gets sentenced? Maybe the judge didn’t like the defendant because of his hairstyle?
Is there any prove that the trial was unfair? No? Than why are we talking about this at all?
Honest question: Why? Aren’t these tariffs on US imports? And aren’t most graphics cards manufactured outside the USA anyway?