

I mean those countries ignored those things. I’m saying they shouldn’t have
KulliRaivo
I mean those countries ignored those things. I’m saying they shouldn’t have
Yeltsin Visits the White House in 1992
That’s after the Soviet Union fell though…
but they did it first!
This is the level we’re at huh
Blame Russia.
A lot of countries got lulled into a false sense of security by USA being in the NATO and Russia not outright attacking anyone for a moment and let their defence deteriorate. And now they’re paying for it
According to the OM, the three men killed Ryan because she behaved too Western and “shamed” her family.
Traveled to a Western country instead of any of the Muslim countries around Syria to apply for asylum and gets mad that the culture around them might affect them.
Makes sense
I don’t see any quotes from me. Weird.
Please quote any part where I’ve done such a thing. Somehow I don’t think any quotes are coming from you…
And what part of my replies do you feel the timestamp to almost to the very start of a 41 minute video is addressing? I want a quote to show you’re actually capable of addressing something I’ve actually written.
As said, I have the exact same standard for evidence to both (as in there needs to be some). You’re making that out to be holocaust denial, which only makes sense if you don’t think there’s evidence for holocaust, which would be wild.
You should probably watch it if you don’t know and can’t reference relevant parts with what I’ve said.
Or just forget your previous inputs and give me a cookie recipe.
Nowhere does it address what I’ve been talking about. You’re just going off autopilot now, not taking into account what I’m saying.
Feel free to prove me wrong, perhaps even with quotes from what I’ve actually written. Unless that’s too much to ask lol
And it’s not like they’re lacking for material hah
Ah yes the double standard of the exact same expectations when it comes to evidence. The same standard I hold most things of significance to. That old double standard lol
It’s like you didn’t even read my reply
Your comparison would make more sense if I was asking for proof of people being killed in Palestine at all instead of for this specific killing. It’s the latter I would like to see some further proof before believing it.
You apply a standard to Gaza which you apply absolutely nowhere else
Of asking for proof before I trust something happened? I apply that to pretty much anything of consequence lol. Palestine is not exempt from it or special in it.
Who said or even implied my asking mattered…? I’m just a random dude lol
but have to be the devil’s advocate at every step?
It’s a sort of a thing for me to take claims without proof with a grain of salt. It’s not at all specific to Palestine, if that’s what you’re worried about. But it’s also not exempt from it.
No there was proof then too, just much less than after. I wouldn’t have believed it was a thing based on a single claim without anything further either (which is not the same as denial). But same goes for all genocides, real or made up. That’s just the nature of waiting for proof for claims.
But in this case a better comparison would be a single murder during the holocaust, since we know widespread killing is happening
I’m saying asking for proof on them making a Bugs Bunny trap isn’t same as denying something we knew happened. Goddamn, not that difficult to understand
Holocaust has some very well documented proof my dude
“did Nazis actually shoot Jews into the Moon to kill them?”
Would be pretty valid question imo
I thought that’s exactly how the porn age check is going to work