Shit, I wonder if something similar will happen with AI.
“Remember the time when running AI required at the very least a very powerful computer running one or more GPUs at 100% capacity? Or entire datacenters costing millions of dollars per month? Crazy, right? Today you just tap your watch with a local AGI, using a couple of CR-2032 batteries that last 6 months, and you can ask it to create a multi-week vacation plan around the Caribbean in mere seconds.”
Hm, I guess you’re technically correct, but going so far back to middle school is like saying that “Santa is being sold as reality” because we thought that he was real at that age.
You probably know this, but aside from that, Claude has “plan mode”. When writing, hit “Shift+Tab” a few times until you select it. Claude won’t immediately start coding when you give it instructions.
Also, ask him about the "superpowers* and “ask questions” skills. Game changers too.
It depends on how it’s executed.
If it’s sold as true satire or fiction, I’m in. WWE, John Wick, Rocky III.
If it’s sold as reality, yeah, it’s garbage.
Edit: though I just read the fucking article and what these fuckers did is inexcusable. And those who watch this, yup, you’re right. Garbage.
Do you tell Claude to make a plan first?
That helps me tremendously. Whenever something needs to be modified, I tell it to update the plan first, and to stick to the plan.
That way, Claude doesn’t rewrite code that has already been implemented as part of the plan.
And understanding the plan helps understanding the code.
Sometimes if I know there will be a lot of code produced, I’ll tell it to add a quick comment on every piece it adds or modifies with a reference to the step in the plan it refers to. Makes code reviewing much more pleasant and easier to follow. And the bugs and hallucinations stick out more too.
Thank you. That was exactly what I tried to express, though I did focus on perception in my reply, I must admit.
Reality is reality. The Earth revolves around the sun, whether earthworms know it or not.
I can understand most of your point, but that last part is just weird. My model of the world is not based on words. It’s based on observation and perception.
That’s like saying that there are facts and alternative facts.
Yeah, “infinite power” is waaaaaay too much power. Unless OP refers free, uninterrupted power that covers any necessity humanity will ever need, without damaging the environment. This is infinitily less power than infinite power.
I believe this can happen, though not in my lifetime.