Guys, hear me out. We take a gigantic carbon capture machine, and just pump as much electricity into it AS WE CAN. Because of the incredible energy consumption, we’ll be using the wood from the amazon rainforest as fuel, BUT IT’S OKAY because we’re just capturing that carbon. Oh also, governments gonna have to pay, it’s a social project after all.
You’re welcome. :)
Me too, hellos!
Shit I forgot to install a firewall.
A single ssd with whatever formatting came with it, along with a webdav frontend I made myself. Very high security (confidentiality) actually, since I check for client side cert, user auth, biometrics (that’s plural), behavior recognition through a custom typing website and hardware token, but the integrity could use some help. And I’m painfully aware that someone could just steal my session.
I love security.
You’ll never get my duck nudes.
In reality I just had a fun night
Letter. Also, people are suprisingly capable if they have no other choice. Don’t see it as an ultimatum. See it as an “I’m doing somehing good for me, this will impact our relationship, I provide a solution to that impact.”.
Banning openai is the equivalent of banning caramel. Sure, it’s gonna be missing, but there’s a million other candies and most people (outside of tech) wouldn’t even really realize it, if they weren’t told.
Google and Meta are different, because they are long standing quasi-monopolies. But even then we could move away from things like search or social media. Services that are more engrained and less visible are going to be the main enemy here.
And no, we’re not doomed. Far from it. This space is in the middle of development. Nothing is set in stone, giants fall left and right, new ones emerge aside them. You’re doing a doomerism.
Not really. I think what you’re on about (not in the british cunty sense), is that they’re part of a venture capitalist company, or got bought up by them and are thus for-profit. Such practices are, in reality, often connected to right-wing politics. Big tech being the best example.
If you have firther questions, you may also dm me.
Impression: Having an opinion about something, often based on observation. Assumption: Something you accept without evidence.
Until you provide some evidence, you do not have the impression that I view this data to be useless, you have an assumption. You can most certainly have the impression that I was unkind though, as that’s based on your feeling, which you seem to base this on. Either way, impressions can still be wrong. Which it was.
I thought I was supposed to be the science naysayer here?
You had me in the first half and then said the irish will go right. They are, by and large, the most oppressed, most stepped on, most ignored people in the world. But hey do have each other. There is not a way in hell that Ireland will pivot to hating their neighbors, they’re too socially advanced for that. And before you say it hit other “advanced” societies too, I said socially advanced. The one thing the USA has been stripping from every other part of the west, where it was still left.
The irish are going nowhere.
You are not adding anything.
The desktop share statistics say otherwise
You know it’s funny. I’m getting called a lib by the left, which I am ironically part of and a dudebro by you, science person, of which group I am also a part of. Plant protein and animal protein having no difference in muscle development has been know forever. Studied in detail by millions of athletes on their own bodies. Your comment assumes I do not appreciate the data produced by this study, which is false.
Just because you don’t like my comment does not mean you get to define me.
Sure, though I rarely say it, this being a science based community makes that sentiment even stronger. But if you step just one toe out of the science world, then every single person that knows a penny’s worth of information about nutrition, knows that it does not matter one bit where the protein comes from. There may be differences in accessing it, but that’s about it. If it were another way, the first people to find would’ve been high-level bodybuilders, but there’s a decent number of vegans in that group, which are just as competitive. And yes, I know hypertrophy ≠ strength, but that’s besides the point.
My point is, this is pretty well known by now and while I find it important to be backed up, I think it is pretty evident from my like/dislike ratio, that there are two groups that interacted with my comment: Ones that think largely scientifically and ones that say “no shit” to this. And I’m not even saying either one is bad, I’m just part of the latter.
You fundamentally misunderstand the techbology you are using. SearXNG is not federated, it is a selfhostable meta search engine. If you have an instance that has a lot of chinese results, then that instance’s owner hss chosen chinese search engines. SearXNG can be considered to have the exact same results as other engines do. You can only receive Google results, Brave, what have you, but it being a meta search engine, you can also mix results. It can also search other indices than search engines for the modern web, such as wikis or published papers. SearXNG is “ironed out”. It’s feature complete.
Hwat exactly do you mean by SearXNG being bad? Cause in some sens that isn’t even a thing. It’s a meta search engine.
deleted by creator
Let me guess, you tried, it’s gone, dissolved?
Things like ad services, Android, other OSs, Hosting/Cloud, lot’s of other stuff. Wikipedia is a good resource.