• 7 Posts
  • 74 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 10th, 2023

help-circle
















  • I watched. He used a prompt with exact wording from an example and obviously it’s the most logical continuation, so AI would generated it. We know how they’re trained. But how many open source prompts will start with exact code and comment? Unlikely to ever happen in real world. So unlikely to he direct infringement. Someone could easily sue the AI companies with these examples to prove it infringes copywrite work, but then govs are going to protect them so it won’t happen.

    It’s unlikely to get identical output without intention, but it’ll also take the infringed actively taking steps to sue that case. Stastical likelihood of this happening in real world is low.

    I’m with you in wanting to watch the AI industry collapse. But I’m unfortunately in a minority without the lobbying power, so it won’t happen.



  • They can. They just need to find the first instance of AI, branch from the commit before and start with that as a basis for master. Then push that branch to their own remote.

    If someone cannot do that, they probably aren’t competent enough to maintain a project of this importance. They can then cherry pick commits that are good and merge those. Or request others recreate new PRS with them with correct attribution. It’s tedious, but easy.

    Maintainership isn’t fun. The hardest problem is finding someone that cares enough to take it on. Many would give advice if someone was willing.

    Sounds like Lutris dev was burnt out, so it would probably quickly replace it.