Russian backed traitors who are willing to hurt their home countries for their own personal benefits. Cunts the lot of them.

Doubt. Both economies benefit greatly from membership.

I get what you’re saying, but the rule is basically just there to not turn the channel into a crypto-ad channel. If you’re making something for/in I2P that somehow touches the crypto space, but that’s not the focus of it then I’m OK with it being posted. I’d be happy to update the rule to something more suitable if you can help me come up with something.

A temporary victory I think. What Musk is trying to upend is the entire Swedish model. I don’t see unions giving up on this, and neither will responsible companies I think, it’s s model that has served us well for over 100 years.

Paywall? https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.telegraph.co.uk%2Fnews%2F2026%2F08%2F09%2Fspy-cameras-on-navy-drones-secretly-sent-data-to-china%2F

We thought we were allies. We were, until Trump came along and decided that any leverage should be used to his benefit. That works in the short perspective, but will be a disaster in the long run.

Imagine a marriage where instead of working together, you try to exploit the other person at every opportunity.

Same, except I don’t work in Spain.

Then they changed it after I posted it. I never edit the headline.

From the article: “Participants competed in artificial intelligence, machine learning, data analysis and complex comremovedtional problem-solving.”

It doesn’t look like it’s just about chatbots. And trust me, I hate chatbots as much as the next guy. There should be a law that the first question a company would have to ask is “Would you prefer to speak to a human instead of our chatbot”, and then mandate that anyone utilizing chatbots would, under the penalty of fines, have to have less than 15min waiting time for people going for the human option.

You’d have to bring that up with the editor of that particular site.

Let me assure you that it would be much more than “a rough month”. You have no idea how many factories run on US tech. Most would grind to a halt, with no chance of restarting in any reasonable amount of time.

We’ve had AI for decades and nobody complained. Machine Learning is as old as dirt at this point. Deep Learning is from 1986. Are there things in the current AI hype that won’t live up to the promises, absolutely, but saying that AI isn’t useful is just plain wrong, and Poland doing good in this space is brilliant.

I’d rather have EU-AI than rely on China-AI or US-AI.

Go Poland. Like or hate AI, the fact that Europe is doing well should be celebrated.

To be fair, the EU doesn’t include all countries in Europe. But honestly, if you hear that “Europe” does something, do you really think that this doesn’t mean the EU?

If someone referenced “America” to me, I’d assume they meant the US and not go “Well, akchually…”

What other entity in Europe could collectively decide to approve something? I mean, it’s not 100% ambiguous, but I think it’s pretty safe guess.

So if there were two vessels and someone said “Look at that big boat”, you’d assume they meant the smaller one because the other was a ship?

Likewise, if someone said “America has a gun problem”, you’re going to assume they mean every single country in both north and south America as a collective?

Seriously?

Generally yes, but there are exceptions. Health, national security…

This guy is petty spot on too. https://youtu.be/eRwzqlpdyjg

A report on it from Australia news. https://youtu.be/u4Kx2USLZGo

When you’re near the coast and someone points and says “Hey, look at that big boat”, do you also feel the need to point out that the vessel in question is actually a ship since it’s gross tonnage is actually above 500?

Sure, words have meanings, but you can also be a little lenient in everyday conversation. You get what they’re saying, don’t you?