

1·
17 days agoI think when you’ve gone ad homonym then I won
From Usenet to MySpace to Facebook to Reddit to Lemmy
I think when you’ve gone ad homonym then I won
No, the camera data is combined into one visual “truth” I would bet. There was a fatal accident where the radar didn’t see a truck because it shot under it. At the time the radar was more trusted than the camera. The only way to solve that was to only have one sensor, and radar could never be the sole input.
Why does no one mention why they said they dropped RADAR: Who do you trust when vision conflicts with RADAR? There were constant problems on this point. LIDAR is another redundant and possibly conflicting input.
Am I showing my age if I suggest ImageMagick?
How can i take an article that uses the word “anywho” seriously?