First word of the post title:

UK

Are you saying a power tool bought at a local shop would NOT harm a kid playing with it?

Doesn’t matter without an anchor point

(For the sake of this discussion, we’re talking spoilers in general, not whether a 5 year old game should be considered spoilerable)

Wait, so your solution to spoilers, is to tell everybody everywhere to stop having auto loaded images in their feed? Instead of, you know, having the OP spoiler tag their content? Wow.

I’m merely pointing out the flaw in what you said. No need to bring up the other arguments when I wasn’t part of them.

not click links clearly marked

Most users are going to see the image directly without clicking anything.

I still want to know how they solved the woman of Kleenex problem. Did Lois use a vagina dentata of kevlar or something?

Parent is saying self driving cars have had a stellar record up until now.

It would be nice if we put as much effort and resources into actually researching and treating the root cause (MAP sufferers) as we did criminalising victimless behaviour which is a symptom of the issue.

Looking good, Raist!

Superman has kids? How?

Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex

Considering their current level of creative control and freedom, that’s like Kim promising nothing will change for the worse in NK.

https://booleanstrings.com/2022/11/04/boolean-search-is-dead/

Boolean operators influence your search results, but are not strictly respected the way you would expect them to be

https://d-shoot.net/kagi.html

Yes sorry, I took that as one and the same.

”computer” in the mathematical sense is well defined of what it can and cannot do.

It is in this universe. Who’s to say the same holds remotely true in a different universe that may have entirely different laws of physics?

Which is worse - AI slop, or people decrying everything they see as AI slop, even when it isn’t?

The Nature paper says they’ve done a proof of concept with a few bits, and concluded that they can reproduce it with cutting edge processors. That’s akin to ‘Mice survive cancer longer’ becoming ‘We’ve cured cancer forever’.

They might be right, but I’m not holding my breath.

If this is the case, then we don’t live inside a computer. Something more than pure comremovedtion is required.

SO many assumptions in that statement

Creationism usually implies the creator put a lot of thought, care, and love into the creation. Knowing what I do of software development, fucking lol.