If we can do plasma deposition for cheap mirror reflective sunglasses with polycarbonate, why aren’t these materials commonly used?

  • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 days ago

    (amateur)

    Also, I can make thermals irrelevant easily with a small heating element and PID loop running on a $0.50 microcontroller. Many people run such elements already to avoid issues with moisture.

    • MysteriousSophon21@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That PID heating setup would draw significant power over an observing session - you’d need a decent power station for field use (check gearscouts.com for options with good $/Wh on LFP batteries that wont die after a year).

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 days ago

      Which is more complexity.

      You haven’t really presented any compelling reasons to use poly.

      Whats the advantage that outweighs the negatives?

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        The OP said cost. A 16" glass mirror is $1400. Adding $20 of microcontrollers, heaters and sensors to a $100 plastic mirror could be extremely interesting.

        There is also a weight savings which makes the rest of the design easier.