SenK@lemmy.ca to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 month agoPeople who reject challenging ideas as stupid without engagement are like intellectual nepobabiesmessage-squaremessage-square107linkfedilinkarrow-up1217file-text
arrow-up1217message-squarePeople who reject challenging ideas as stupid without engagement are like intellectual nepobabiesSenK@lemmy.ca to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square107linkfedilinkfile-text
Inheriting their worldview from consensus or comfort, never having to earn it through actual thought.
minus-squarepresoak@lazysoci.allinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoIt’s bad because it MIGHT be used as a low-effort defense?
minus-squareSpiffyPotato@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoAlmost, the two parts that make it problematic to me are: It can be used used as a low-effort defence The defence is a personal attack
minus-squarepresoak@lazysoci.allinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoAh, actually The defence CAN BE INTERPRETED AS a personal attack. That gate has 2 locks.
It’s bad because it MIGHT be used as a low-effort defense?
Almost, the two parts that make it problematic to me are:
Ah, actually
The defence CAN BE INTERPRETED AS a personal attack.
That gate has 2 locks.