• gravitas@lem.ugh.im
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Its not up to grapheneos devs which devices support bootloader relocking with different keys, literally only pixels allow this and without it you cant properly secure the phone.

      • unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        …without it you cant properly secure the phone.

        My understanding is that a locked bootloader helps protect against evil maid attacks and bootloader-level malware persistence. I find this a security risk that I would absolutely take for Google independence. “Properly secure” is subjective.

        GrapheneOS do decide what phones they support. It is exactly their choice to support only Google Pixels, rather than taking a security hit for hardware independence (whether you agree with the decision or not).

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      13 hours ago

      They’re working on an alternative device with a large OEM they’ve not disclosed yet. They’re aiming at releasing it in 2027.

      • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The smart money is they’re going to go with Motorola, honestly idc who they go with it’ll likely be my next phone

          • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I’ve got the pixel 8 with graphene on it, it’s very nice but I also have a soft spot for emulation and the Tensor devices are trash for anything higher than GameCube tbh