• ugo@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Your definition of full time is incorrect. Full time is 40h/week, at 52 weeks per year that’s 2080 hours per year. 3000 hours of overtime puts the total at 5080, or 19.5 hours per day.

      That’s by working 5 days a week, every week, no vacation nor PTO nor sickness.

      It is fraud

      • oaklandnative@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        I think you are a bit off with your assumptions. In California, overtime is earned either when you work more than 40 hours per week, OR more than 8 hours a day.

        So technically he could have for example worked three 24 hour shifts in a week, which would equal three 8 hour shifts (24 regular time hours) and three 16 hour overtime blocks (48h OT). 48 * 52 = 2,496 OT. He could have even been sleeping and on call while working that OT.

        Definitely poor management but not guaranteed fraud. The math is more nuanced.

        • ugo@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          And it’s legal to have 24h shifts? Or 16h of overtime in a day?

          Edit to add: I don’t know how it works in california, but where I’m from on-call duty is not the same as overtime, and you can’t mix the two. And there are limits to shift time (including on-call) + overtime. So even if it was legal to have 8h shifts and 16h of on-call duty (it isn’t) it wouldn’t be classified as overtime