• _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    you:

    the entire idea is that it would be open source so we can know that it’s not doing anything shady.

    them:

    Any relevant device supplied for use in the UK must have installed tamper-proof system software

    The bill also seeks “Action to prohibit the provision of VPN services to children in the United Kingdom” and wants “all regulated user-to-user services to use highly-effective age assurance measures to prevent children under the age of 16 from becoming or being users.”

    This will effectively ban end-to-end encrypted communication and open source operating systems like GrapheneOS and forbid that people have administrator rights on their own devices.

    tell me you didn’t read the linked info without telling me you didn’t read it.

    • Lojcs@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      What made you think I was proposing a scheme compliant with the bill? I repeatedly said that this would be to prevent such a bill from passing. And explained my reasoning why it would do so.

      To make it doubly clear: I don’t support what they’re trying to do. I just think it could do us good to ourselves address any legitimate concerns they use as excuses to implement surveillance so it’s harder to use them as excuses.