The worst-case scenario is now a possible one: European troops fighting off an invasion largely alone.

It’s by no means clear the Europeans would succeed. Romanian and other European officials at the exercise in Cincu, about 260 kilometers (162 miles) north of Bucharest by road, voiced concerns about how long it would take for NATO allies to make it to the front.

French four-star General Philippe de Montenon said he’s confident Europe could prevail, even without the US on side. “The direction of history is a progressive disengagement of the United States from the European continent,” he said.

archive

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    49 minutes ago

    French four-star General Philippe de Montenon said he’s confident Europe could prevail, even without the US on side.

    This is discussed too rarely. Does anybody know of a source that makes a reliable comparison?

    • Riddick3001@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      38 minutes ago

      Only the formerly head US forces in NATO, Ben Hodges afaik, has oftentimes said similar lines, like here :

      Europe should “quit whining” about the threats it faces and “act like the superpower” that it is, according to a former senior US army officer.

      Generally, he’s quite confident about Europe defending itself.

    • Riddick3001@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Such is life currently: hyperbolic questions in ironic comments like " have you proof about Ruzz agression, because the West…" etc.

      Smh, about the contrast between their potential to embrace a grand selfdeception and the arrogant stubbornness to look away from the invasive destruction and killings Shahed drones cause on a daily bases for more than a thousand days.

  • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    15 hours ago

    NATO/EU needs to start moving resources more into place. This will cause putin to have to move troops out of Ukraine to balance.

  • join@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Is there any credible material proof that Russia is preparing for an invasion of Europe???

    They are just barely capable of winning a slow war of attrition against Ukraine, how can you make a credible argument they could achieve any war aims against all of Europe?

    You can’t even argue they can take one country at a time, the entire border is riddled with NATO tripwire troops, guaranteeing the direct involvement of each major European military from the get-go.

    Is this just fearmongering to drum up support for more military Keynesianism?

    • Jimbel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Russia is already attacking EU/NATO with their hybrid war. Russia is pushing all these far right movements in europe and usa. They also attacked critical infrastrucure e.g. the internet cables and send their drones into europe. Also Russia send killers into europe to kill certain individuals e.g. in Berlin the “Tiergarten killer”. Russia needs to feel that it can no longer do this without consequence. Europe needs to walk the talk.

    • falseWhite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      They already have invaded Europe. For the second time in the last decade.

      Fyi, Ukraine is in Europe.

      Fuck USA for abandoning it’s allies, the whole world is realising they cannot be trusted.

      The EU is doing the right thing by arming up.

      • join@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        They have invaded Ukraine, a country that is not in NATO nor in the EU, this article is talking about a war with all the European member states of NATO. I think my wording was clear.

        And considering rearmament, do you know what the security dilemma is, and what that means for the security of everyone in Europe?

        • massacre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Ukraine is still in Europe no matter how you spin it. Russia has also invaded NATO aligned airspace, cut infrastructure lines in the ocean, likely blew up a critical fuel pipeline, continues aggressive cyber warfare, bombed a railway in Poland, and pays for bots and misinformation campaigns and supports right wing fascism in the US and EU. They rattle their nuclear sabre constantly and have also had illegal incursions across borders like Finland… Tell us again how Russia isn’t a nascent threat to all Europeans after invading a sovereign country twice, downing passenger jets and sending proxy ships for covert unconventional warfare? The EU is under attack already and at least Poland is awake to it.

    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      It also causes resources to go to the eu’s defense instead of Ukraine’s offense so it’s in Putin’s interest to spread the rumors.

  • jazzkoalapaws@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    It’s kind of funny how the West is getting beat by its own game.

    We only care about the money.

    Edit: Apparently this reality upsets a lot of you.