Trump’s officials are quietly concerned about his “blatant criminal behavior.” What took them so long?

It is time to stop examining the chaos and time to do something about it.

I have a source inside the Trump regime who feels, in their own words, “a little disillusioned.” This person says they signed on to the Trump team because of “DEI going too far” and because “woke culture was dividing the country,” but is now concerned about the “blatant criminal behavior” of Donald Trump. Really? His last administration didn’t show you that? Well, OK.

This source first approached me by saying, “I can provide you bonafides to show you I’m serious.” That impressed me because I didn’t think many people inside the Trump regime knew what bonafides were, let alone how to be serious.

This source’s concerns about Trump are indeed legitimate, and deserve to be heard. “Not all of us are buying everything he says,” this person told me. “We understand the problem, but we see no solution. You guys in the press, with very few exceptions, are not trustworthy. Congress can’t be trusted and the judiciary so far hasn’t been able to stop him.”

  • OutlierBlue@lemmy.cadeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    because of “DEI going too far” and because “woke culture was dividing the country,”

    No, woke culture unites the country. That’s the fucking point. “Woke” means you accept that everyone is different and you agree to tolerate and respect those differences. Your insistence on hating people you view as different is what divides us.

    • Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Bullshit. “Woke culture” is also filled with evangelism, moralizing, and authoritarian assertion. You guys just want different people beaten with sticks by the pigs.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        No, you just get 100% of your political knowledhe from the Conservative Propaganda Machine.

        All Woke means is “Live and Let Live.” What is the problem with some people choosing different paths for their lives? You go your way, they go theirs. As long as you don’t mess with their journey, nobody will mess with yours. See how that works?

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            enforcement by police is only applicable when there is imminent physical harm to others… principals of non-discrimination are ensured by courts - like employment law about non-discrimination due to race… nobody has been beaten by the police because they refused to employ a POC due to their race

              • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                and which side is protesting against the police use of force and wants change?

                you say that the “woke” crowd want DEI enforced by a police baton, and then move the goalposts to that if we make the rules we won’t have any control over the use of force to enforce them, while it’s a subset of that exact crowd that are chanting “defund the police” while the anti-woke are “thin blue line”

                the woke crowd want to be able to live life like anyone else, and doesn’t want anyone to face police violence… it’s the anti-woke crowd that want more police violence and more reason to use that violence on everyday people who don’t fit the mould

                • Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Every law is enforced through death at some point. When you write a law, you are saying it’s okay if police enforce it to the death. If you are okay with having police at all, you are okay with state violence.

      • dryfter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        DEI and “woke culture” made me feel seen as a person with a disability and a facial paralysis. 100 years ago I would have been an orphan and hidden away. Not long before that I would have been “sacrificed” as an evil baby.

        Did corporations cash in on that? Yes they did because that’s all corporations are supposed to do is make money and bleed the consumer.

        If you are anti-woke and anti-DEI then you’re really saying you want to include everyone who looks like you and relegate those who don’t to obscurity either by way of deportation, exile, slavery, or death. It’s exactly like what every country perpetuating genocide has done in history.

        What is your solution to my problem of again not feeling like I can go out in public because of this administration’s policies. What about to the LGBTQIA people who are afraid that their marriage will be nulled or are also afraid to go out in public?

        Are you ok with fixing people different from you back to isolation, declining mental health, and attempts to take their life because of getting rid of DEI?

        • Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I live my life, look out for my neighbors, don’t litter, and don’t talk to cops. You’re all naive enough to think your opinion holds value 20 feet outside your radius.

      • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        No, it isn’t. You want something to really worry about? Communism. You should dread communism. For real. Go to bed every night praying that there isn’t a communist revolution in the US.

        We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.

        (Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon, 1852)

        • 3abas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Now go articulate to yourself what you think communism is and what you think is so scary about it, then maybe consider reading the source material.

          • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Retribution is so scary about it. Unless you own the means of production or think you’re going to miss capitalism, you don’t have much to worry about.

            • 3abas@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Unless you own the means of production

              I don’t, and your audience here don’t, so I’m not sure why you’re telling them to be afraid.

              or think you’re going to miss capitalism

              Not a concern, no…

              What are you scared of? Are you literally Elon?

                • 3abas@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What specifically about communism are you afraid of? articulate it, or admit that you do not know or understand what you’re afraid of.

                  And if that’s the case, it’s okay, it’s okay to be afraid of the unknown. But it’s not okay to insist that you know what you don’t know is scary. Communism isn’t what’s scary, capitalism is, unless you’re a capitalist, which you’re not.

                  You’re a worker who works for a capitalist.

  • Bongo_Stryker@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Meanwhile, with a compromised press and Trump ignoring any judicial ruling he dislikes, the Democrats are still no help. They’re nearly as crazy as Trump if they think that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez could be a viable presidential candidate. No matter what they think of her policies, very few Republicans who despise Trump would vote for her. “I wouldn’t,” my White House source told me. “I’m not crazy. The far left is as bad as the far right, and they’re the reason I voted for Trump.” There are plenty of moderate Democrats who agree.

    Imagine thinking AOC is far left. Ok now imagine thinking that kind of far left is just as bad as the far right.

    Like for example, informing people of their constitutional rights, advocating for things like accessible Healthcare and protections for workers is every but as bad as shipping people off without due process to El Salvador prison where they’ll die, grabbed by a militarized and masked police force that snatches people off the street, or from their homes or school.

    Somehow it’s the fault of the democrats who won’t accept moderate Republicans. But also there are plenty of moderate democrats that agree that the far left is just as bad.

    Well it’s amazing that insiders are finally able to suspect something is wrong, but they are still so gripped by cult doctrine they can’t make any progress.

    • AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Two extremely qualified women both were defeated by the worst candidate in our countries history.

      I love AOC and her policies, but this country has proven it’ll vote for literally the worst encapsulation of boomer greed than vote for a capable and competent woman. Twice.

      The Democrats are morons if they pick a woman to run next time. Simple as that.

      Let AOC kick Schumer out and take his senate seat. She would be much more effective there.

        • Gsus4@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          What is extremely qualified for that job by your standards? Like, name a person.

          • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Bernies would’ve been a good example, no longer as he’s too old. Pritzker would’ve been. Anyone who doesn’t bend to the establishment.

            People who follow security procedure would be pretty great too.

            Hillary is so establishment entrenched it’s ridiculous. Harris did not have a spine enough to run her own campaign right. Those are what I feel make them less qualified for the office.

            I don’t exactly go around looking at politicians to see if I think they’d be good as presidents …

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Bernies would’ve been a good example, no longer as he’s too old.

              Now that we don’t have to pretend that Biden is lucid, Sanders is conveniently too old now.

              • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                He’s older than biden lmfao. Yeah no shit he’s too old. He got too old after 2016… Arguably even before then…

                Now that we don’t have to pretend that Biden is lucid,

                Overstatement