Google recently open sourced Pebble and today, Repebble has put some of the watches up for preorder.

  • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    Is there any company that let’s you export your health tracking data in a non proprietary format and doesn’t charge you a monthly subscription to use your smartwatch’s health tracking features?

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    I’ve pre-ordered the Core Time 2.

    Pre-orders are something I never usually do, but given this is essentially just an improved version of an existing product, as opposed to a Kickstarter, I feel more confident. And I can cancel the preorder at any time (plus I’ll see reviews of the cheaper model before the Core Time 2 ships).

    The price made me wince, though. It’s very expensive for the functionality. Technically cheaper than the original watches adjusted for inflation, but that ignores the current-day smartwatch market. Still, I loved the Pebble, so I think it’s worth it.

    • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I pre ordered, and I’m usually annoyingly loud about not pre-ordering. That being said, i love my pebble time. I Kickstarted it back in the day, and it still works but the battery is weak. I could replace the battery, but i want more devices like this, so I’ll put some money in and eat Ramen for a few weeks.

  • phx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    I still have my circa-2016 email confirming my pledge for the Time 2 Silver, which ultimately got cancelled just before the fulfillment date due to Pebble selling out to Fitbit.

    While I loved my original Pebble back then, I would really want something similar to look and function of the T2S so will watch this project in hopes it too is resurrected

    • rhymepurple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      I understand that the watch operating system is open source. However, it seems that the watch will connect to a companion smartphone app. Do you know if the app is a requirement and/or if the app will be open source?

      • Wise@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        Core 2 Duo

        • 1.2" black/white e-paper screen

        Core Time 2

        • 1.5" 64 color e-paper screen

        Am I missing something?

        • Farid@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          The watch featured a 32-millimetre (1.26 in) 144 × 168 pixel black and white memory LCD using an ultra low-power “transflective LCD

          The problem is that e-paper is a category of displays, and some companies label reflective LCDs as “e-paper”. Which is subjective (and I personally heavily disagree with that categorization, cause then LCD clocks and Gameboys have “e-paper” displays, too).

          But in the comment I responded to it was said Pebble has “eink” display, which is categorically wrong, as that is a very specific proprietary technology, which is e-paper in traditional sense, like the ones in Kindles.

          • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            I believe these are sharp’s memory in pixel lcds. They’re much lower power than something like the game boy screen as each pixel retains its state and doesn’t need to be refreshed from the controller constantly. I actually like these little screens quite a lot. Worse pixel density and don’t look as good as e-ink when static, but still really Low power and can refresh way faster and smoother when needed.

            • Farid@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              I’m not criticizing the screens, they are ok and I loved my Pebble Time Steel until the battery swelled and popped off the screen. I’m just saying that calling these e-paper is a deceptive marketing strategy.

          • n2burns@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            Your response says, “not epaper” which is categorically wrong. I assume you meant to say “eink”

            • Farid@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              As I mentioned earlier, whether a screen type is considered e-paper is subjective. And in my opinion, reflective LCD isn’t a type of e-paper. You may disagree, but it’s not “categorically” wrong.

  • zarenki@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Of all possible names, they’re really using “Core 2 Duo”? I feel like anyone who has been following tech long enough would immediately think of the Intel processor when hearing that name.

  • Kaloi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    I still can’t believe that no one else has made a smart watch with physical buttons and low energy use that has surpassed the pebble after all this time. I’m still cautious that this venture will pan out, but honestly there really hasn’t been a smart watch released that matches my use case. Sleep tracking makes no sense if I have to charge the watch daily, as I’d probably charge it over night. Media control with screen buttons is awful. Fossil came close with their hybrid smart watch, but the layout of the media controls made no sense and couldn’t easily be used without looking at the watch. Just let me check my calendar and texts and skip through ads in podcasts, and last over a week of battery and you will have my money.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    I’m still very confused about why we needed PebbleOS for this. It’s been like 10 years and no one could come up with any comparable software? They whipped up the hardware design in a few months.

    • "no" banana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      From what I’ve read from Eric since this relaunch was announced, he just wants a new pebble and so do some of the userbase. This project isn’t really intended as a viable, polished product. Rather it’s a niche thing made for a Core audience of nerds.

      Disclaimer: I’m one of the nerds this is intended for. I instantly pre-ordered a watch because it’s a pebble. I7

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        he just wants a new pebble

        I’m sure that’s what he wants you to believe.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          I had a Pebble Time Steel and it was the best watch I’ve ever head. I want another Pebble. So does Eric. So I gave him money to make me one.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            Yeah, I get that. My question is why Eric (or literally anyone else) didn’t just re-make the Pebble (or similar) under a different name at any time in the last 10 years? Why did they wait for the OS to be open sourced instead of just making a new one?

            • Synestine@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              20 days ago

              Methinks you underestimate the complexity.

              And all the other watch makers I’ve looked at are not doing, or even considering, what Pebble did.

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                20 days ago

                Methinks you underestimate the complexity.

                Maybe I do. But there are dozens of Chinese no-name companies who developed entire smartwatch ecosystems.

                • Synestine@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  Dozens? Name three, and be sure to include number of aps in each ecosystem.

                  I’m sure there are dozens of Chinese smart watches, but most that I’ve seen are white-labels and sorely missing an ecosystem.

    • something_random_tho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      PebbleOS was awesome, though. Such a well thought out system for end-users, and it already has tons of apps. Developing for it (in C!) is also super easy because it has an amazing SDK.

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Pebble sounds cool but i really dont like square watches(except the retro casios and gshocks) and now its owned by google so thats shit as well.

    • Synestine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Google dumped the Pebble OS code on GitHub when this whole “rePebble” thing (not Rebble) started. Now there’s a new phone app coming out soon (or out now, depending on your platform and abilities) that handles old and new Pebbles and modern phone platforms.

      None of this is from Google.

    • TheBampster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Pebble time 2

      Just got this to talk to my phone, gadget wraps carbon and clear screen protector. All I need now is to find out how to change the watch face.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Made another post but it was removed for…reasons. Migi says you shouldn’t expect your Pebble to last >5 years.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      It reads to me like he’s saying that if you expect 5+ years without maintenance if it’s more than $100, you should look at a different product.
      The top comments are someone saying that after five years they needed to repair it due to battery failure, and the founder saying the repair process is the same.

      Five years is longer than the average lifespan of a liIon battery. Expecting to be able to skip repairs that long is unreasonable for a $150 product.

      It reads like the founder actually giving realistic expectations. A $150 product will likely need repairs to last longer than five years, and you’ll be disappointed if you expect otherwise.

      Can you point to a similar product that costs about as much that fits your criteria?

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        It doesn’t read to me like you will have to replace the battery, it reads to me like he’s saying don’t expect the device itself to last >5 years.