I do. Looks at the words chosen to write the article. There is a lot of emotion behind the words chosen, I know what an unbiased author would be, while everyone conveys emotion to a certain extent, when the entire article is written that way, it’s easy to tell the bias.
I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I’m not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy
Those articles are clearly written in such a way their bias doesn’t show (that was sarcasm btw).
These articles that disagree with me are clearly biased… against me.
Cool, keep making stuff up. If facts were important to you you’d know that it’s not biased against me, just the authors are clearly biased lol
I’m not sure you even know what “bias” means, nor do you understand that there’s no such thing as an “unbaised” author.
I do. Looks at the words chosen to write the article. There is a lot of emotion behind the words chosen, I know what an unbiased author would be, while everyone conveys emotion to a certain extent, when the entire article is written that way, it’s easy to tell the bias.
I opened your links and perused what was written. And when things are written factually there is less bias. Those wors used by NYT show bias, not facts. I’m not the only one here who needs to improve their media litteracy
How many emotive words are in a text is orthogonal to how many facts are in a text.
Not always lol