• randy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      But note this paragraph in the article:

      The ironic truth is, privacy extensions make you more unique, since fewer people have them. So a smart tracker could detect that, ignore the signals disrupted by the extension and focus on the ones that are not.

      The tracking mechanisms that this article uses are not the only ones available to actual bad actors.

      • Zarobi@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It’s like if you’re the only one with a hoodie and mask in a crowd ~ but if everyone is wearing one, it’s much more effective disguise

      • potustheplant@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If adoption spreads, that would no longer be true. So, instead of providing reasons not to use these types of measures, you’re just confirming that it’s the right path.

      • NoXPhasma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m aware, should still be less unique than a fingerprint. Although there are much more invasive techniques, question is if developers actually use those, instead of going the easy route and detect most users anyway.

    • Epzillon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      been on uMatrix to default block all scripts, XHR and iframes for years but this would be a nice addition on top for the sites i actually need to enable it on. I mostly block all kinds of tracking but fingerprinting is always annoying