shrewdcat@lemmy.zip to Linux@lemmy.ml · 22 days agoFan of Flatpaks ...or Not?imagemessage-square309linkfedilinkarrow-up1774
arrow-up1774imageFan of Flatpaks ...or Not?shrewdcat@lemmy.zip to Linux@lemmy.ml · 22 days agomessage-square309linkfedilink
minus-squareT Jedi@bolha.forumlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·21 days agoSystem themes, probably most of them work. But most of them don’t bother watching the user themes or icons folder. I don’t think Flatseal is that useful for the majority of users, no. But it is a good tool to have in mind when the need arises.
minus-squareOutwit1294@lemmy.todayBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·21 days agoWhy do you think it is not useful? I replaced Firefox system package with Flatpak because I think browser is the most used and vulnerable thing in my system. And the size seemed reasonable. I did not replace Thunderbird because its size is almost 10 times.
minus-squareDanWolfstone@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·21 days agoThe person you’re replying to is talking about the permissions manager flatseal, not flatpaks
minus-squareOutwit1294@lemmy.todayBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up3·21 days agoOops. I got confused
System themes, probably most of them work. But most of them don’t bother watching the user themes or icons folder.
I don’t think Flatseal is that useful for the majority of users, no. But it is a good tool to have in mind when the need arises.
Why do you think it is not useful?
I replaced Firefox system package with Flatpak because I think browser is the most used and vulnerable thing in my system. And the size seemed reasonable.
I did not replace Thunderbird because its size is almost 10 times.
The person you’re replying to is talking about the permissions manager flatseal, not flatpaks
Oops. I got confused