• baines@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    lmao it really doesnt matter, could you be any more up your own ass

    but anyway this isnt about having google or apple scanning your phone files

    anyone paranoid (rightly or not) enough to think they need to physically cover their camera shouldnt have a phone with a fucking camera

    there is a reason presidents in the past got a special locked down phone, and the fact certain idiot heads of state not using those special phones while discussing even state secrets is a big deal

    if you are covering the camera but not worried about the mic…

    and lol if you think this cant be done remotely with 0 user input

    https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/21/trump-phone-security-risk-hackers-601903

    anyone this important needs to be using a safe device, said device would not need a sticker on its camera, and probably would not have a camera to begin with

    • Aqivex@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      You’re arguing with yourself, while agreeing with me, while calling me up my ass?

      Who’s your drug dealer, I want to meet 'em.

      • baines@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        my point hasnt changed

        if you couldnt get how it was relevant the first time that is on you

        and i called you up your own ass because of the very thing you are doing here again

        anyway, waste of time have a block