• James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Honestly if someone is literally asking to get put on a list of toxic users I see no reason they shouldn’t be accomodated, it will be doing a favor to those of us who appreciate having the feature.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 days ago

      list of toxic users

      Oops! You accepted the premise of someone who shipped a hidden filter list in FOSS. Someone acting dishonestly shouldn’t be taken at face value.

            • Grimy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              7 days ago

              The situation would be the same if he also could block you for other users and instances without telling them.

              Personally blocking a user on your account is fine Personally blocking a user from your admin is fine

              Both those things use Lemmy tools and the modlog. Banning people with a secret shadowban malware list and distributing this malware to other instances is unethical.

              I’m fairly certain this user is Admiral Patrick’s alt. He is in every thread not only defending but straight up lying.

              I highly urge everyone to go take a look at the list. There’s lgbt communities and instances, small news orgs and even a word ban so your comment doesn’t show if it has “Epstein class” in it for example.

              The app only showed you half the ban list, it hid the LGBTQ bans, users and comment stuff from what I understand.

              • James R Kirk@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                I don’t consider an optional ui used by optional instances with an optional and clearly labeled feature that enables an optional GUI toggle that allows users to control a filter that does not actually ban anyone to be “malware”

                • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  clearly labeled

                  Clear as mud. You knew adding the entire Blahaj instance on a “toxicity” filter would cause an uproar, that’s why you went out of your way to hide it.

            • natebluehooves@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              if you are capable, reflecting on this moment where you visibly outed yourself on this alt may be wise. you put your worst foot forward by being a sarcastic prick.

    • freagle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 days ago

      Way to just accept the framing of the censor without any amount of critical thinking what so ever.

    • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 days ago

      list of toxic users

      Bro like every major account on this site is on that list, and most of them are chill and not toxic at all, just leftists.

      Why would you trust the word of a developer that hid this list in a file that is downloaded after install, rather than the official blocklist in the git repo? Are you really that gullible?

        • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Why don’t you ask the developer enforcing a secret blacklist? What a stupid fucking comment, holy shit.

          EDIT: Oh, you are the dev. Fuck off, loser.

            • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              7 days ago

              [Citation Needed Jackass]

              Seems like there wouldn’t be this big hubbub if the dev hadn’t been a sneaky asshat who decided to control the views of anyone using their front-end without notification they were going to change.

              • James R Kirk@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago
                • The full list with detailed explanations is available publicly in the GitHub repo.

                • The “toxic mode” toggle is visible in the tesseract GUI along with another explanation of what it does

                • Tesseract is not a default Lemmy UI, an instance admin has to manually add it in order for it to be accessible.

                • Tesseract’s toxic mode filter does not ban anyone

                • Instance admins are not forced to use Tesseract

                • Users are not forced to use an instance that provides Tesseract as an option

                • Users are not forced to enable the toxic mode filter on instances that have the toggle enabled

                • We are all free to block whomever we please on our own accounts

                • Admins are free to ban whomever they please from their instances that they own

                • We do not get to decide who gets banned from other peoples instances

                • We do not get to decide what other people read

                • Other people do not owe you or I an explanation of why they do the things they do in their free time

                • We do not get to control what other people create in their free time